On 2013-08-09 23:47:40 -0600 Riccardo Mottola riccardo.mott...@libero.it
wrote:
This reminds me that we should seriously try again getting a decent Emacs
with GNUstep.
Riccardo
Sometimes I try Emacs with gnustep, but there are an error that
crash emacs at startup. This error don't occurs
On 9 Aug 2013, at 16:42, Gregory Casamento greg.casame...@gmail.com wrote:
Bean runs beautifully on machines which came out with 10.4, but was dog-slow
on machines of the same era
I don't suppose you've profiled this? Our text system uses skiplists, which
are a data structure that made
Hi all,
apart from patching the objc-load.m part, I also patched some portions that
do with launching processes. All of the attempts at mixing MinGW-style
loading with Cygwin-based code seem very messy, and in the end I'm not
absolutely sure it was necessary: Cygwin has some issues with fork()
Great that you could get GNUstep working again on Cygwin.
The call to /bin/rebaseall belongs somewhere into the target.make file
of GNUstep make. Anybody with more insight should place it there.
As for the objc-load.m patch I think that your change is fine and should
be applied, but more work is
On 10 Aug 2013, at 14:59, Fred Kiefer fredkie...@gmx.de wrote:
The call to /bin/rebaseall belongs somewhere into the target.make file
of GNUstep make. Anybody with more insight should place it there.
On Win16 and Win32 (but not Win64), DLLs are not position-independent code and
are expected
If one of us ever feels tempted to work for the NYTimes:
https://github.com/NYTimes/objective-c-style-guide
cheers,
Lars
___
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
Hi all,
I have committed some changes to objc-load.m and to NSPathUtilities.m that
are needed to run Calculator without errors and warnings, respectively.
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 4:09 PM, David Chisnall david.chisn...@cl.cam.ac.uk
wrote:
On 10 Aug 2013, at 14:59, Fred Kiefer fredkie...@gmx.de
As an end user I'd like to voice a couple of frustrations with the existing
desktops. Some of these arguments have been stated before but I hope they
will guide you guys in the future. Ok, so gnome version 2.x We had this
really nice lightweight GUI framework called GTK 2.x, you made a desktop
