Marko Riedel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
go into Info/Preferences and set the defaults for a2ps and gs (as
documented on the web page). I guess Yap should do this automatically. I
will try to remember to implement this. Thanks!
I don't have a2ps installed and I'm not sure which of the many
On 2007-02-10 01:30:13 +0100 Enrico Sersale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is that mdextrator seems to be a cpu and memory hog :
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
30304 philou25 0 172m 22m 7876 R 86.8 1.5 6:13 mdextractor
Is this normal,
On 2007-02-10 13:02:48 +0200 Philippe Roussel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-02-10 01:30:13 +0100 Enrico Sersale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is that mdextrator seems to be a cpu and memory hog :
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
30304 philou
Hi,
The upper textfield appears a long way from where I expect it
(off the window initially, have to resize to see it).
Is this just a bug or am I doing something silly ?
#import Foundation/Foundation.h
#include AppKit/AppKit.h
@interface MySubView : NSView {
NSTextField *p0;
}
On 10 Feb 2007, at 11:23, Paddy Smith wrote:
Hi,
The upper textfield appears a long way from where I expect it
(off the window initially, have to resize to see it).
Is this just a bug or am I doing something silly ?
I think probably something silly ... bear in mind that a views
[sorry, hit send button too fast on the last mail]
On 2007-02-10 12:20:48 +0100 Enrico Sersale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mean that 93.8% is *after* the first indexing?
It should look something like this:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
27821 root
Stefan Bidigaray schrieb:
On 2/9/07, *Enrico Sersale* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, this is the normal behavior.
At this point I'd really need a gdb backtrace; you must only use
debugapp instead of openapp and send me the results...
Keeping in mind
In an attempt to get back to GNUstep, I tried on the LiveCD version
i486-1.0. It can't boot my box with Intel 965 chipset natively, which
is pretty normal for current Linuxes. Booting in VWware appears to
work fine, though.
Now I want to install onto the hard disk. The LiveCD's ReadMe
Enrico Sersale schrieb:
On 2007-02-10 14:52:48 +0200 Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Bidigaray schrieb:
On 2/9/07, *Enrico Sersale* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, this is the normal behavior.
At this point I'd really need a gdb backtrace; you
On 2/10/07, Richard Frith-Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10 Feb 2007, at 11:23, Paddy Smith wrote:
Hi,
The upper textfield appears a long way from where I expect it
(off the window initially, have to resize to see it).
Is this just a bug or am I doing something silly ?
I think
On 2/10/07, Markus Hitter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In an attempt to get back to GNUstep, I tried on the LiveCD version
i486-1.0. It can't boot my box with Intel 965 chipset natively, which
is pretty normal for current Linuxes. Booting in VWware appears to
work fine, though.
Now I want to
On 2/10/07, Paddy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
D'oh! I really thought I'd checked that the origins coming in there were 0,0.
I just figured I'd want them if I moved to another frame of reference (like
if I ditch views).
So the NSRect that is passed in is the frame in terms of the containing
I'm writing a GUI-less application and find the need for plugins.
Avoiding the pro's and con's of doing so, is it POSSIBLE? If so, how
would I go about it? Basically the main application would be a single
executable. But I am at a loss to figure out how to build the plugins
(with OS X I would just
Hi all
Does anyone here know whether GNU/gcc/GNUstep are planning to track the
syntax runtime changes coming in Apple's Objective-C 2.0? If so, please
post info or links.
Thanks
Michael
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_/_/ _/_/_/
On 10 Feb 2007, at 00:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm writing a GUI-less application and find the need for plugins.
Avoiding the pro's and con's of doing so, is it POSSIBLE? If so, how
would I go about it? Basically the main application would be a single
executable. But I am at a loss to
On 2007-02-10 16:43:48 +0200 Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enrico Sersale schrieb:
On 2007-02-10 14:52:48 +0200 Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Bidigaray schrieb:
On 2/9/07, *Enrico Sersale* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, this is the normal
Am 10.02.2007 um 15:55 schrieb Stefan Bidigaray:
As you can see they're pretty rough!
Yes, not exactly what one would expect from a 1.0 release. Worse, it
depends on a network; this cdebootstrap thing likely takes ages
with my modem.
*sigh*
Markus
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On 2/10/07, Markus Hitter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, not exactly what one would expect from a 1.0 release. Worse, it
depends on a network; this cdebootstrap thing likely takes ages
with my modem.
*sigh*
Well, as far as I understand it, the idea behind the GNUstep Live CD is to
give you a
Hello all,
I will definitely fix this soon and precisely in the manner you describe.
I do think a2ps is useful to have, as it can format source code very
nicely. Moreover it has a delegation that lets you effortlessly use Yap to
preview and print LaTeX files. You need the right delegations,
Enrico Sersale schrieb:
On 2007-02-10 16:43:48 +0200 Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In both the cases, it seems that there is something related with
-GSReadRect: because both the apps try to create some resized imges
using [NSBitmapImageRep initWithFocusedViewRect:].
In that case you
God I surely hope to hell not.
--
Jeremy Tregunna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9-Feb-07, at 7:48 AM, Michael Hopkins wrote:
Hi all
Does anyone here know whether GNU/gcc/GNUstep are planning to track
the
syntax runtime changes coming in Apple's Objective-C 2.0? If so,
please
post info or
On 2007-02-10 13:56:30 +0200 Philippe Roussel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[sorry, hit send button too fast on the last mail]
On 2007-02-10 12:20:48 +0100 Enrico Sersale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mean that 93.8% is *after* the first indexing?
It should look something like this:
PID
22 matches
Mail list logo
