On 12/10/2015 02:26 AM, Svetlana A. Tkachenko wrote:
> 1) as far as I can see GitHub things are separate from decision being
> discussed - this thought is reasonable, right? it is so because github
> can't be the official place
I haven't yet seen a final word from Greg about GitHub. So I don't
Dne 10.12.2015 06:27, Richard Stallman napsal:
GitHub does a number of things that are wrong. It requires users to
run nonfree programs (Javascript code in web pages) to do certain
operations (see http://gnu.org/philosophy/javascript-trap.html).
So instead of giving people a choice of not
I'll only consider part where my reply can be useful and possibly
educational.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:26 AM Svetlana A. Tkachenko <
svetl...@members.fsf.org> wrote:
> 3.2) also the code review, but i have no idea how it was done in the
> past or how to approach it;
I'm unaware that GS has a
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> So instead of giving people a choice of not running these scripts, you
>
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> GitHub does not encourage posting code without a license.
Practically speaking,
