Second, I didn't know how to make a GNUmakefile using only
GNUstep-base. Reading the docs shows me that you should include
tool.make at the end... here is a sample of what I did:
I'm not sure which doc you read, but the following might help you --
On 9/21/05, Adrian Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 21, 2005, at 3:55 AM, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
Quoting percy tiglao [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I do not feel like stepping all the way into the NeXT framework, but
I'd like to use Objc as a development language (I'm going to be
building
Quoting percy tiglao [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello, I am very new to Objective-C and I'd like to try it out for a
while (looks like the language I'm looking for, dynamic, small,
compiled, portable, and C-like)
Good choice. :-)
I do not feel like stepping all the way into the NeXT framework, but
On Sep 21, 2005, at 3:55 AM, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
Quoting percy tiglao [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I do not feel like stepping all the way into the NeXT framework, but
I'd like to use Objc as a development language (I'm going to be
building games, and portability to both Windows and Linux is a top
Difficult question ... libobjc is really obsolete in terms of
functionality. You don't even get a string class - you have to write
everything that a normal 'foundation' library has from scratch, which is
really a waste of your time, given we have an excellent library already.
On the other end,
- Original Message -
From: percy tiglao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 11:55 AM
Subject: GNUstep base vs libobjc
Hello, I am very new to Objective-C and I'd like to try it out for a
while (looks like the language I'm looking for, dynamic, small
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: GNUstep base vs libobjc
libobjc was not made obsolete by GNUstep, it was bug-fixed ;-)
and while AppKit is not that portable (despite some claim to the contrary,
while it works on windows, for example, it feels ugly and behave... very
