RE: GNUstep on the rise!

2005-08-05 Thread Sašo Kiselkov
Quoting Vaisburd, Haim [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Cris Vetter wrote: [...] [ GNUstep separate OS ] AFAIK, xMach is dead :-( So does anyone know how far Hurd is with respect to usability? [...] Sorry, I deleted the essential part of Cris' letter that I'm going to reply. I guess when Chris

Re: GNUstep on the rise!

2005-08-04 Thread Chris Vetter
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 09:50:47 Tabitha McNerney wrote: Hi all, I have to say that when I read this about DRM and Apple Intel machines: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/01/0421248from=rss it made me realize even more so how important it is that GNUstep continue to rise

Re: GNUstep on the rise!

2005-08-04 Thread Yavor Doganov
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 09:17:05 +0200, Chris Vetter wrote: AFAIK, xMach is dead :-( So does anyone know how far Hurd is with respect to usability? It is usable, at least much more usable than it used to be. You might want to take a look at Michael Banck's announcement [1]. For the time being

Re: GNUstep on the rise!

2005-08-04 Thread Sašo Kiselkov
Quoting Chris Vetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: A few days ago I read an article mentioning, among other things, GNUstep and how 'cool' (my choice of words) it would be if/when/whether 'these guys' (ie. the developers of GNUstep) would decide to put GNUstep on top of their OWN operating system

Re: GNUstep on the rise!

2005-08-04 Thread Nicolas Roard
On 8/4/05, Sašo Kiselkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Chris Vetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: A few days ago I read an article mentioning, among other things, GNUstep and how 'cool' (my choice of words) it would be if/when/whether 'these guys' (ie. the developers of GNUstep) would decide to

Re: GNUstep on the rise!

2005-08-04 Thread reuss
Sašo Kiselkov wrote: Quoting Chris Vetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: A few days ago I read an article mentioning, among other things, GNUstep and how 'cool' (my choice of words) it would be if/when/whether 'these guys' (ie. the developers of GNUstep) would decide to put GNUstep on top of their OWN

Re: GNUstep on the rise!

2005-08-04 Thread Chris Vetter
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:26:47 Nicolas Roard wrote: [...] Well, GNUstep itself should stay as it is, cross-platform, indeed. Absolutely. [...] For me the only real option would indeed to have a GNUstep OS containing only GNUstep apps, to really have a consistent and powerful environment that

Re: GNUstep on the rise!

2005-08-04 Thread Sašo Kiselkov
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sašo Kiselkov wrote: Of course, I'm not against a GNUstep-only-system (hell, I already did it as my graduation work at high school, complete with a CD-based installer, integrated workspace, it's own package management, etc.), is it downloadable? Well, sorry

Re: GNUstep on the rise!

2005-08-04 Thread Trevor Fancher
On 2005-08-03 14:50:47 -0500, Tabitha McNerney [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hi all, I have to say that when I read this about DRM and Apple Intel machines: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/01/0421248from=rss it made me realize even more so how important it is that GNUstep continue

RE: GNUstep on the rise!

2005-08-04 Thread Vaisburd, Haim
Cris Vetter wrote: [...] [ GNUstep separate OS ] AFAIK, xMach is dead :-( So does anyone know how far Hurd is with respect to usability? [...] Sorry, I deleted the essential part of Cris' letter that I'm going to reply. I guess when Chris was talking exclusive GNUstep experience he meant