Quoting Vaisburd, Haim [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Cris Vetter wrote:
[...] [ GNUstep separate OS ]
AFAIK, xMach is dead :-( So does anyone know how far Hurd is with
respect to usability?
[...]
Sorry, I deleted the essential part of Cris' letter that I'm going to
reply.
I guess when Chris
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 09:50:47 Tabitha McNerney wrote:
Hi all,
I have to say that when I read this about DRM and Apple Intel machines:
http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/01/0421248from=rss
it made me realize even more so how important it is that GNUstep
continue to rise
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 09:17:05 +0200, Chris Vetter wrote:
AFAIK, xMach is dead :-( So does anyone know how far Hurd is with respect to
usability?
It is usable, at least much more usable than it used to be. You might
want to take a look at Michael Banck's announcement [1]. For the time
being
Quoting Chris Vetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A few days ago I read an article mentioning, among other things, GNUstep and
how 'cool' (my choice of words) it would be if/when/whether 'these guys'
(ie. the developers of GNUstep) would decide to put GNUstep on top of their
OWN operating system
On 8/4/05, Sašo Kiselkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Chris Vetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A few days ago I read an article mentioning, among other things, GNUstep and
how 'cool' (my choice of words) it would be if/when/whether 'these guys'
(ie. the developers of GNUstep) would decide to
Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
Quoting Chris Vetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A few days ago I read an article mentioning, among other things, GNUstep and
how 'cool' (my choice of words) it would be if/when/whether 'these guys'
(ie. the developers of GNUstep) would decide to put GNUstep on top of their
OWN
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:26:47 Nicolas Roard wrote:
[...]
Well, GNUstep itself should stay as it is, cross-platform, indeed.
Absolutely.
[...]
For me the only real option would indeed to have a GNUstep OS
containing only GNUstep apps, to really have a consistent and powerful
environment that
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
Of course, I'm not against a GNUstep-only-system (hell, I already did it as
my
graduation work at high school, complete with a CD-based installer,
integrated
workspace, it's own package management, etc.),
is it downloadable?
Well, sorry
On 2005-08-03 14:50:47 -0500, Tabitha McNerney [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi all,
I have to say that when I read this about DRM and Apple Intel machines:
http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/01/0421248from=rss
it made me realize even more so how important it is that GNUstep
continue
Cris Vetter wrote:
[...] [ GNUstep separate OS ]
AFAIK, xMach is dead :-( So does anyone know how far Hurd is with
respect to usability?
[...]
Sorry, I deleted the essential part of Cris' letter that I'm going to
reply.
I guess when Chris was talking exclusive GNUstep experience he meant
10 matches
Mail list logo