In my opinion, I think Cocoa compatibility is ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL to
GNUStep.
It is on the basis of Cocoa compatibility that I managed to convince
my department
that Cocoa / GNUStep should be the way to go for our development
needs. We need
application framework that is compatible with
Andy,
Allow me to make it clear:
* The GNUstep Project is committed to Cocoa compatibility. Period.
You have nothing to fear on that front.
Later, GJC
--
Gregory CasamentoGNUstep Chief Maintainer/Gorm Maintainer
- Original Message
From: andy.somogyi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discuss
From: Nicolas Roard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- what do we really gain from compatibility?
But there's also apps like Vienna or Sketch we ported
straight from OSX to GNUstep/etoile, apps that fabien
ported too (MPlayer, etc), and I forget others.
And there's as usual all the apps that
Am 07.08.2007 um 03:22 schrieb Vaisburd, Haim:
For this, of course, we should not abandon X windows like Apple
did.
FYI: Neither NeXT nor Apple did ever use X as their windowing system.
You'd better get informed before you starting to rant.
regards,
Lars
On 8/7/07, Vaisburd, Haim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From many discussions on this list I got an impression that every
attempt
of porting any serious Mac OSX application failed - either because of
Carbon
or because of some toolkits on the top of AppKit that we do not have.
If this is a wrong
Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 07.08.2007 um 03:22 schrieb Vaisburd, Haim:
For this, of course, we should not abandon X windows like Apple
did.
FYI: Neither NeXT nor Apple did ever use X as their windowing system.
You'd better get informed before you starting
Hi,
Sorry for the delay in response - I was travelling this weekend.
From: Richard Frith-Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In my mind, people who focus on Mac OSX compatibility [...]
do not expect independent development.
I think this just shows that your mind is a long way
out of touch
Haim,
I disagree with Fabien 100%.Mac OS X compatibility is essential to GNUstep.
Naturally, getting everything stable takes priority. However, as you can
see from my previous responses, he was wrong about there being no Roadmap...
there is one he was wrong about there being no
Am 03.08.2007 um 21:05 schrieb Vaisburd, Haim:
I, on the contrary, believe that we can do better, even much better.
GNUstep already does better in some areas. There is no Carbon burden,
instead there is cross platform compatibility, to point out two
examples.
Obviously, there are
On 8/3/07, Markus Hitter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously, there are visionaires in the Etoilé group: http://
www.etoile-project.org/etoile/blog/2007/07/road-to-coreobject-
part-1.html My comment: great idea, but when would you expect this
to be widespread technology if you cant afford to
10 matches
Mail list logo
