Jesse, did you get a chance to check my post to the webmasters' ML? I
summarized what we've talked about in here, and added some things of my own:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnustep-webmasters/2007-11/msg4.html
Stefan
___
Discuss-gnustep
Hi,
I think a site restructuring good. The current site makes thigns
difficult, although it improved a little over the time. Your proposal
sounds roughly pretty good.
I'd not change the design too much though, I got accustomed to the
current design, I don't rememebr who did it, but it is
FYI, I moved this conversation and added a summer to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnustep-webmasters/2007-11/msg4.html (I
think, at the time I wrote this it still hadn't been updated, check
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnustep-webmasters/2007-11/threads.html if
I'd not change the design too much though, I got accustomed to the
current design, I don't rememebr who did it, but it is fine.
This is the new design, in case you missed the link:
http://jesseross.com/clients/gnustep/site/02.png
Response has been positive overall, so that is what I am
Jesse Ross wrote:
I guess I didn't explain that point too well. What I was trying to
say is that image size detracts from the other contents on the page.
I agree that we should have GNUstep images on the homepage, just not
that big. When reading the content you had on that mock-up (I'm just
What I am missing on these web pages are the links for developers. OK,
this is very egoistic, but this was one of the few reasons for me to
check out the GNUstep page from time to time, it was a hub for
different
development links. We surely can improve on that :-)
What type of developers
Jesse Ross wrote:
What I am missing on these web pages are the links for developers.
OK, this is very egoistic, but this was one of the few reasons for
me to check out the GNUstep page from time to time, it was a hub
for different development links. We surely can improve on that :-)
What
I am not asking for much, I have been a GNUstep developer for too long
already. What I want o find there is about the same amount of
information already at.
http://www.gnustep.org/developers/
GNUstep currently is mostly for developers and we should pay attention
to that. As soon as we have more
I'm interested in coming up with a new site architecture and
design. I'll send some preliminary ideas to the mailing list in a
few hours.
Great!!!
Here is my preliminary design:
http://jesseross.com/clients/gnustep/site/01.png
It uses the following site structure:
Home
Jesse,
That's exciting. It looks really good. Already it's much livelier and more
engaging than the existing site and it does send the message that we're still
here.
GJC
--
Gregory Casamento -- OLC, Inc
# GNUstep Chief Maintainer
- Original Message
From: Jesse Ross [EMAIL
Forgot to CC the list...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Stefan Bidigaray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 11, 2007 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: Site Redesign (was: Objective-C 2.0 and other new features in
Leopard)
To: Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like it, except for those
I like it, except for those pictures in the right, they are a
little too in your face. I do think we should have a screenshot on
the homepage, but I think it should be something a little more
subtle than that (and by that I mean smaller sized, like the way we
currently have it but not
Homegnustep.org
- Get Started /start (overview, downloads, installation)
- Documentation /documentation (wiki-based docs)
- News /news (planet-based)
- Status/status (CIA feed)
- Applications
Homegnustep.org
- Get Started /start (overview, downloads, installation)
- Documentation /documentation (wiki-based docs)
- News /news (planet-based)
- Status/status (CIA feed)
- Applications /applications
On Nov 11, 2007 4:34 PM, Jesse Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know about everyone else, but when I first visit a site for
an application, toolkit, or even programming language, I check out
the screenshots. It helps me to better understand what the project is
all about by being able to
I guess I didn't explain that point too well. What I was trying to
say is that image size detracts from the other contents on the
page. I agree that we should have GNUstep images on the homepage,
just not that big. When reading the content you had on that mock-
up (I'm just curious that
I guess I didn't explain that point too well. What I was trying
to say is that image size detracts from the other contents on the
page. I agree that we should have GNUstep images on the homepage,
just not that big. When reading the content you had on that mock-
up (I'm just curious that
fantastic.
On Nov 11, 2007 5:29 PM, Jesse Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess I didn't explain that point too well. What I was trying
to say is that image size detracts from the other contents on the
page. I agree that we should have GNUstep images on the homepage,
just not that big.
A link to the wiki on the top menubar would be useful too. Another
useful addition would be a planet like feed aggregator.
Both are actually already in there :)
The wiki will live under Documentation, and News is the home for the
Planet.
J.
19 matches
Mail list logo
