Hi Riccardo,
thanks for your response. If I can help somewhere, please let me know.
> Am 10.03.2024 um 00:07 schrieb Riccardo Mottola :
>
> Hi,
>
> lars.sonchocky-helld...@hamburg.de wrote:
>> My opinion to, to long, unstructured texts are a bad thing (in Germany we
>> say „Bleiwüste“ to
Hi,
lars.sonchocky-helld...@hamburg.de wrote:
My opinion to, to long, unstructured texts are a bad thing (in Germany we say
„Bleiwüste“ to this). But hidden stuff is also not the best. The most important
things should be visible at a glance.
To be honest, it has some structurem but I get
Hi,
while simplifying some other elements on the home page (it got indeed
crowded with time, with the urge to put everything on "the first click"
and thus making a big lump of even repeated stuff) I took another attempt.
Riccardo Mottola wrote:
thanks for your opinion. "External" had a
Hi Riccardo,
> Am 22.02.2024 um 12:57 schrieb Riccardo Mottola :
>
> Hi Lars,
>
>
> lars.sonchocky-helld...@hamburg.de wrote:
>> Some initial remarks first: I appreciate the effort you’re making to get us
>> a better website. But I think before we lose ourselves in details of the
>> menu
Hi,
Riccardo Mottola wrote:
I think it is not a big evil to have 4 menus, we have decent screens
and it encourages browsing items (and thus encourages discovery, not
needing to put everything in the text).
minor update: I tested the 4 menu navigation on an iPad and it continues
to work
Hi Lars,
lars.sonchocky-helld...@hamburg.de wrote:
Some initial remarks first: I appreciate the effort you’re making to
get us a better website. But I think before we lose ourselves in
details of the menu structure, we should think about which audience we
want to carter.
No, I don't want
Hi Riccardo and others,
Some initial remarks first: I appreciate the effort you’re making to get us a
better website. But I think before we lose ourselves in details of the menu
structure, we should think about which audience we want to carter.
Is it developers? Is it users? Is it both? Is it
Hi,
H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Indeed. Placing a prominent "Bug" button in front will carry the message that the
Software is "buggy"... So it may have an unintended negative effect.
But "Help"/"Support" is much better, IMHO.
You have a point and I agree. I made a new proposal, I pushed it
> Am 19.02.2024 um 12:11 schrieb Riccardo Mottola :
>
> Hi,
>
> Daniel Boyd wrote:
>> My vote is the "prominent place" option even though I admit it does detract
>> somewhat from a clean aesthetic. But I think it's worth it.
>
> You and Fred - opposite opinions.
> In my original design
Hi Fred,
Fred Kiefer wrote:
I like the way you put it in the menu. The name „External“ is really a bit
confusing, but at the moment I don’t have a better idea.
thanks for your opinion. "External" had a meaning year ago, when the
project was on savannah and differently organized, most links
Hi,
Daniel Boyd wrote:
My vote is the "prominent place" option even though I admit it does
detract somewhat from a clean aesthetic. But I think it's worth it.
You and Fred - opposite opinions.
In my original design years aog, I put the bug prominent, then just
before our site crash, I
My vote is the "prominent place" option even though I admit it does detract somewhat from a clean aesthetic. But I
think it's worth it. By having it in a prominent location, the most direct effect is that it will be easier to find. I don't
think that matters as much for developers, most of whom
I like the way you put it in the menu. The name „External“ is really a bit
confusing, but at the moment I don’t have a better idea.
Cheers,
Fred
> Am 16.02.2024 um 15:38 schrieb Riccardo Mottola :
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to uniform the bug reporting on our website.
> Originally, we had a single
Hi,
I want to uniform the bug reporting on our website.
Originally, we had a single page on savannah for all projects. I found
this better than the current situation of github, were every sub-project
has its own issue tracker. This makes reclassifying a bug impossible and
also confuse
14 matches
Mail list logo
