Hi Sophie,
I know some other issues are more important but I want to remember per
PM about my posting
(http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/msg06195.html).
Is there any interest on doing this? Then I will post it again on the
discussion-list or better on the project-list.
2011/6/5 André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net
Hi,
Am 04.06.2011 18:41, schrieb Ian Lynch:
On 4 June 2011 17:29, Gianluca Turconipub...@letturefantastiche.com
wrote:
Is it sure there will be a *product*?
I think IBM need it for symphony so on those grounds alone I'd say there
will be
Hello,
there's an interesting thing with regards to donations: Since the latest
announcements on OpenOffice.org, we're getting nearly three times as
many donations as usual.
Thanks, folks, for the ongoing support!
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hello,
there's an interesting thing with regards to donations: Since the latest
announcements on OpenOffice.org, we're getting nearly three times as many
donations as usual.
Thanks, folks, for the
Sophie Gautier wrote:
My mail was a bit long, I know, but if you read until the end it says
I did read it to the end. It would be silly to make comments without reading
all ;)
It still isn't clear what you don't need technical skills means...
Apparently in this community only developers
Hi Sam, *,
please forward this also to the apache-list where I'm not subscribed
(I suggest only Sam does, in order to prevent 50 people forwarding the
very same mail :-D)
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Christian Lohmaier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/06/2011 15:25, Jim Jagielski wrote:
now options open and available to LOo and OOo that, until
a week ago did not exist. Maybe some of those long-term
The major, if not only option is that one can now contribute code
directly to IBM, which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/06/2011 15:00, Jim Jagielski wrote:
A formal, legal foundation. The ASF is a recognized 501(c)3, non-
TDF might not have 501(c)(3) status, but then consider that it is
incorporated in Germany, not the United States.
More pointedly, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/06/2011 10:48, Sam Ruby wrote:
of the code that they are willing to share the burden of maintenance
with the larger community.
You do realize that IBM will _NOT_ contribute any code to Apache
OpenOffice don't be.
I have to wonder where the
Hi Plino,
On 06/06/2011 12:33, plino wrote:
Sophie Gautier wrote:
My mail was a bit long, I know, but if you read until the end it says
I did read it to the end. It would be silly to make comments without reading
all ;)
Sorry, I should have put a smiley, I didn't want to sound hard
It still
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hello,
there's an interesting thing with regards to donations: Since the latest
announcements on OpenOffice.org, we're getting nearly
- Original Message
From: sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com
To: steering-disc...@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Mon, 6 June, 2011 12:35:04
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] About elections
Hi Tom,
On 06/06/2011 14:20, Tom Davies wrote:
[...]
Hi :)
Agreed. But the founders
Il 06/06/2011 10:05, Florian Effenberger ha scritto:
Hello,
there's an interesting thing with regards to donations: Since the latest
announcements on OpenOffice.org, we're getting nearly three times as
many donations as usual.
Thanks, folks, for the ongoing support!
Florian
but this
Hi,
yahoo-pier_andreit wrote on 2011-06-06 13.51:
but this donations are for openoffice.org or for TDF libreoffice??
for TDF/LibreOffice.
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 |
On Jun 6, 2011, at 5:37 AM, toki wrote:
I am sure that the concept of the ASF being bullied by IBM
or being the pawn of IBM sounds attractive and makes for
compelling tweets.
The fact is that it's not true, any more so than TDF is a
pawn of Novell for example.
I am not replying in this case to
Hello,
Does anyone know when is the 3.4 version going to be available in the Ubuntu
PPA?
Cheers!
Jaime R. Garza
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/2011 13:25, Jim Jagielski wrote:
that his mind is made up, whether based on reality or not.
The reality is that IBM employees wearing their IBM hats, have made it
crystal clear on the general@incubator list that IBM is going to force
The
http://openofficeday.osdev.co.th/
Unfortunately, we have to use the name OpenOffice Day this year because we
want to get the most attention from businesses. Next year, if we have the
chance to organize it again, it'll be LibreOffice day :)
It is a 1-day, 1-track press-conference/seminar that
On Jun 6, 2011, at 11:56 AM, toki wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/2011 13:25, Jim Jagielski wrote:
that his mind is made up, whether based on reality or not.
The reality is that IBM employees wearing their IBM hats, have made it
crystal clear on the
Hello,
The problem is caused by the reasons for
Bug 37860 - Formula returns #VALUE in 3.4RC2 but works as expected in 3.3
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37860
Does anybody know a simple solution how to leave calculated cell
contents (Empty) instead of Number Value 0 in column H
Hi Samphan,
On 06/06/2011 19:03, Samphan Raruenrom wrote:
http://openofficeday.osdev.co.th/
Unfortunately, we have to use the name OpenOffice Day this year because we
want to get the most attention from businesses. Next year, if we have the
chance to organize it again, it'll be LibreOffice day
(I've dropped the cross post to the Apache Incubator since I'd like to
pick up just the topic of readiness)
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Greg Stein wrote on 2011-06-05 20.39:
snip
This might not affect other topics, but honestly, I
Do you mean using a formula or by changing the source code?
Where is the attached file ? :)
(This mailing list doesn't support attached files. You need to upload it
somewhere)
--
View this message in context:
On 6/6/11 5:56 PM, toki wrote:
The reality is that IBM employees wearing their IBM hats, have made it
crystal clear on the general@incubator list that IBM is going to force
The Apache Foundation to take the project.
Wearing my TDF hat, I kindly ask all TDF members and supporters to
refrain
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:17, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hi Jim,
Jim Jagielski wrote on 2011-06-06 18.06:
The reality is that IBM employees wearing their IBM hats, have made it
crystal clear on the general@incubator list that IBM is going to force
The
Hi
Am 06.06.11 18:06, schrieb Rainer Bielefeld:
The problem is caused by the reasons for
Bug 37860 - Formula returns #VALUE in 3.4RC2 but works as expected in 3.3
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37860
Does anybody know a simple solution how to leave calculated cell
contents
plino schrieb:
Do you mean using a formula or by changing the source code?
Hello,
formula, of course. Requests for code changes I would have posted in
libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org
Where is the attached file ? :)
In the referenced bug report, of course!
(This mailing list doesn't
Hi,
Kevin Lau wrote on 2011-06-06 15.35:
-Can you help me to understand this Simon posted one possible creative
solution?
It seems the discussion is making progress. I like to think this is
appropriate to be seen in Initial source files (was: OpenOffice: were are
we now?) thread than here.
Sorry, I assumed you meant attached here, not on the report :)
You have two options: dump 3.4 and go for 3.3.3RC1 :)
Or use conditional formatting to set the font colour to white if value = 0
--
View this message in context:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:46, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Greg Stein wrote on 2011-06-06 18.36:
...
The software grant is a done deal. I happen to believe the proposal
will be accepted, but it is not a done deal.
Ah, okay - so the software grant exists independent
On 6/6/11, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
the project? Bob can say whatever he'd like on his blog.
...
In any case... stop assuming that what *one* person says is
representative of the entire (ASF) community. That simply isn't true.
...
That blog is responsible for quite a lot of
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 13:07, Augustine Souza aesouza2...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/6/11, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
the project? Bob can say whatever he'd like on his blog.
...
In any case... stop assuming that what *one* person says is
representative of the entire (ASF)
My apologies if this proposal is out of place on either list, but I think it's
worth thinking about early. Obviously I speak for neither Apache nor TDF but I
have a deep concern for OpenOffice.org and am very keen to see the community
healed.
Given that:
* both LibreOffice (October, Paris)
Hello Rainer,
Rainer Bielefeld schrieb:
Hello,
The problem is caused by the reasons for
Bug 37860 - Formula returns #VALUE in 3.4RC2 but works as expected in 3.3
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37860
Does anybody know a simple solution how to leave calculated cell
contents
Actually some of us at ConCom are already deep into discussion about what
meetings would best support better understanding between parties.
As an Apache member, I'm normally quite willing to see email thrash
eventually work itself out...but this news has caused so much concern (and
circular
Hi Simon,
On 06/06/2011 20:18, Simon Phipps wrote:
My apologies if this proposal is out of place on either list, but I think it's
worth thinking about early. Obviously I speak for neither Apache nor TDF but I
have a deep concern for OpenOffice.org and am very keen to see the community
Hi Samphan,
sophie wrote (06-06-11 18:10)
Thanks for sharing, and the great support of the Thai community.
I wish you all the best for your seminar!
+ 1 Good to read !
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting
I seem to be really missing something in all this talk about the
transfer of OOo.
1: What would TDF do with the code? At this point in time LibO is way
ahead of OOo in features and code clean up, from the patches flying in
the dev list.
2: What would TDF do with the OpenOffice.org name
HI,
On 06/06/2011 22:20, Andy Brown wrote:
I seem to be really missing something in all this talk about the
transfer of OOo.
and we really have work to do on our next versions, believe me,
talking/reading is really time consuming
1: What would TDF do with the code? At this point in time
I believe he is asking
Why would we want the code to begin with at this point.
at the time of the fork, we already had all the code that was in OOo up to
that point, now LO has added more code, cleaned up a lot of code, and has
the backing of several large Linux companies. So why at this point
Hi Robert,
2011/6/6 Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Greg Stein wrote on 2011-06-05 20.39:
snip
This might not affect other topics, but honestly, I think the perception
of
what
On 06/06/2011 22:54, James Walker wrote:
I believe he is asking
I believe I was answering
Why would we want the code to begin with at this point.
there is no questioning right now because their is no 'would' and there
is no 'code'. So as I said, wait for the real to discuss the 'want' and
On Jun 6, 2011, at 3:57 PM, Volker Merschmann wrote:
Hi Robert,
2011/6/6 Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com:
Until the TDF has taken that last step, expect to be challenged about
your readiness ;-)
I'd like to take up your offer :-)
But here on this list and on the
Hi,
Jim Jagielski wrote on 2011-06-06 22.13:
Good to see the list... Not knowing things for sure, but I
would guess that Oracle had issues with #3, which gave away
(what I would expect to be) huge chunks of h/w infrastructure,
esp to an entity which was still in the process (though close!)
of
Hi,
2011/6/6 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com:
On Jun 6, 2011, at 3:57 PM, Volker Merschmann wrote:
2011/6/6 Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com:
Until the TDF has taken that last step, expect to be challenged about
your readiness ;-)
I'd like to take up your offer :-)
But
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
I seem to be really missing something in all this talk about the transfer of
OOo.
1: What would TDF do with the code? At this point in time LibO is way ahead
of OOo in features and code clean up, from the patches
todd rme wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Andy Brown
lt;a...@the-martin-byrd.netgt; wrote:
Instead, what we are looking at one group
having the name and official control of the code base, and the other [...]
Nah. they will get the trademark, or more exactly, for now, a grant to
Andy Brown wrote:
I seem to be really missing something in all this talk about the
transfer of OOo.
1: What would TDF do with the code? At this point in time LibO is way
ahead of OOo in features and code clean up, from the patches flying in
the dev list.
2: What would TDF do with the
On 06/06/2011 06:32 PM, Robert Derman wrote:
Andy Brown wrote:
I seem to be really missing something in all this talk about the
transfer of OOo.
1: What would TDF do with the code? At this point in time LibO is
way ahead of OOo in features and code clean up, from the patches
flying in
Sophie Gautier wrote:
Sorry, I should have put a smiley, I didn't want to sound hard
You were not, don't worry ;)
Sophie Gautier wrote:
There is a lot to do in our project that doesn't need to be developer or
too technical. Why do you feel that and what should we change to enhance
On 06/04/2011 05:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
...
Whether OOo lives or dies in Apache, Oracle has made it abundantly
clear that this is it... This is one promise I fully expect Oracle
will keep :/
Interesting...
Could you clarify that statement?
1. @ASF: What happens to OOo if ASF votes *not*
Hello everyone,
given that the Foundation is close to being created, and that we have
now nearly 100 approved members (thanks to the membership committee for
their great work!), I guess that in the near future we should think
about holding elections for the future board of directors. IIRC,
Hi :)
I think 100 is still quite small compared to the numbers of people actually
involved. So the list of members is still more like a special-interest
sub-set. The founder members are doing a great job and i hope that they stay
in
place for a long while yet.
Regards from
Tom :)
-
Hi Tom,
Tom Davies wrote on 2011-06-06 11.22:
I think 100 is still quite small compared to the numbers of people actually
involved. So the list of members is still more like a special-interest
sub-set. The founder members are doing a great job and i hope that they stay in
place for a long
- Original Message
From: Volker Merschmann merschm...@gmail.com
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Mon, 6 June, 2011 11:02:56
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] About elections
Hi,
2011/6/6 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org:
Tom Davies wrote on
Hi Volker, all,
On 06/06/2011 13:02, Volker Merschmann wrote:
[...]
I'd like to add that not every contributor wants to be a member of the
foundation. Especially those who are payed for the work might not like
to have a too personal connection.
We can ask the membership committee if there is a
- Original Message
From: sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Mon, 6 June, 2011 12:10:30
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] About elections
Hi Volker, all,
On 06/06/2011 13:02, Volker Merschmann wrote:
[...]
I'd like to add that
Hi Marc,
So ! thanks for your awesome work around the 3.4features page - very
much appreciated.
Since you're clearly so effective in making our webpages look pretty, I
was wondering ...
Is there any chance you could help fix / improve our donations page ?
first - IMHO we
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
- Original Message
From: sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Mon, 6 June, 2011 12:35:04
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] About elections
Hi Tom,
On 06/06/2011
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 09:41 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
Until then it is pretty much vaporware and there is not much to do,
even less to vote about.
100% agreed. I'm eager to vote in support of / on our SC - since it
seems some criticise them for being un-elected :-) Nice to knock
Le Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:52:17 +0100,
Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com a écrit :
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 09:41 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
Until then it is pretty much vaporware and there is not much to do,
even less to vote about.
100% agreed. I'm eager to vote in support of
On 6/6/11 8:07 PM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Michael Meeksmichael.me...@novell.com a écrit :
100% agreed. I'm eager to vote in support of / on our SC -
since it seems some criticise them for being un-elected :-) Nice to
knock down all the objections one by one of course.
+1
+1
62 matches
Mail list logo
