Hi,
Le 29/10/2011 00:16, Cor Nouws a écrit :
Hi,
I noticed that the old users forums from OOo are not available any more.
I was not a frequent visitor, but helped a bit with questions (on the
Dutch language version) now and then. There was a mixture of questions
related to OOo and of
On 29/10/2011 08:23, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Hi,
Le 29/10/2011 00:16, Cor Nouws a écrit :
Hi,
I noticed that the old users forums from OOo are not available any more.
I was not a frequent visitor, but helped a bit with questions (on the
Dutch language version) now and then. There was a
On 10/29/2011 10:16 AM, Olivier R. wrote:
AFAIK, forums migrated on Apache server only because TDF has always favored
mailing-lists and seemed to have low respect for forums. Before Apache, TDF
seemed not concerned with forums hosting.
When we started the project in 2010, human bandwidth was
Hi,
Am 29.10.2011 10:16, schrieb Olivier R.:
Forums administrators and volonteers have always claim to be
non-discriminative. They support all versions of the software: LibreOffice,
OpenOffice.org, NeoOffice, etc.
That´s correct. And that´s why the following is *not* correct:
TDF has
Hello Charles,
providing mailing lists seems to mean that we don't
respect forums
No. You are twisting what I said.
Apache offered to host forums. There have been a lot of discussions, and it
was not easy to find a common ground.
Did TDF offer to host forums ?
Regards,
Olivier
--
View this
Charles,
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Perhaps, but I actually heard a similar argument about the lack of
respect to the forums (but apparently you make a different point) from
several people over the last months, hence my reaction.
Maybe I should have written “lack of consideration” instead
Hello,
Stefan Weigel wrote on 2011-10-29 11:35:
It´s not a matter of low respect. It´s just not necessary to mess
around and create yet another forum, since there are already
well-settled forums, driven by the community, that fully cover
LibreOffice.;-)
the points raised by Italo are not
On 29/10/2011 14:30, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
Stefan Weigel wrote on 2011-10-29 11:35:
It´s not a matter of low respect. It´s just not necessary to mess
around and create yet another forum, since there are already
well-settled forums, driven by the community, that fully cover
Dear Bernhard,
Bernhard Dippold wrote on 2011-10-29 01:24:
After quite an amount of time and a lot of work for LibreOffice and
OpenOffice.org before I have to tell you that I'll have to stop my
activities in this great community.
it comes with gread sadness to read those lines. Over the
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-10-29 14:33:
I am more then willing to volunteer a section on my forums for
Libreoffice and the TDF discussion and support as well. I am using phpbb
for the forums though :(
thanks a lot for that offer. If we, however, decide for TDF forums, I
On 29/10/2011 14:38, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-10-29 14:33:
I am more then willing to volunteer a section on my forums for
Libreoffice and the TDF discussion and support as well. I am using phpbb
for the forums though :(
thanks a lot for that
On 10/29/2011 11:37 AM, Olivier R. wrote:
Did TDF offer to host forums ?
Yes
--
Italo Vignoli
italo.vign...@gmail.com
mobile +39.348.5653829
VoIP +39.02.320621813
skype italovignoli
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems?
Le 2011-10-29 08:55, Jonathan Aquilina a écrit :
On 29/10/2011 14:38, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-10-29 14:33:
I am more then willing to volunteer a section on my forums for
Libreoffice and the TDF discussion and support as well. I am using phpbb
Having received no objections to the preliminary election results I posted on
October 20th within the period described in the election rules, it is now my
pleasure to declare the results of the 2011 Board elections for The Document
Foundation.
I declare the following Members of The Document
Hi Bernhard,
Bernhard Dippold wrote (29-10-11 01:24)
After quite an amount of time and a lot of work for LibreOffice and
OpenOffice.org before I have to tell you that I'll have to stop my
activities in this great community.
Thanks for working with us - I'm glad that I learned to know you
Hi Italo,
Italo Vignoli wrote (29-10-11 11:26)
LibreOffice is going forward and bringing new features to users, with an
increasingly different code base. OOo is going backwards, [...]
From what I've seen the past year, I am not positive too about OO,
especially not compared to LibreOffice.
Hi Dennis,
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote (29-10-11 20:47)
I am also not aware of any discussion that was antagonistic to TDF
whatsoever among those involved with finding a resolution for the
migration of the OOo Forums to a reliable hosting. The key objection
was to preserve and continue that
Hi Andrea,
Andrea Pescetti wrote (29-10-11 01:11)
I believe that in general fragmenting support is not a good idea, unless
it is really needed.
Me too - though there are some nuances.
I write about this in some other mails.
Regards,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
--
Unsubscribe
I know that I am skipping a lot of the back-and-forth here, but let me point
out the elephant in the room...
Why forums in the first place?
I think that most people on the mailing list know about stack exchange, and
how rockin' it is. I think it would bee a) cool and b) a boon to our mutual
On 29/10/2011 Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Even if I tried not to compromise my real life by my LibreOffice
activities, I had to realize, that I can't reach this goal
Thanks Bernhard for your long history of contributions to OpenOffice.org
and later LibreOffice. I understand that the time comes
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:45:38PM +0200, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 10/28/2011 12:05 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
tomorrow, at 1400 UTC, the next conference call takes place. Right now,
we are in a transition phase from the Steering Committee to the Board of
Directors, so I would like to
On 10/29/2011 06:47 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
following today's SC/BoD phone conference, I'd hereby like to propose,
based on André's suggestion, that the to be elected membership committee
will consist of
five regular members
plus two deputies
I'd ask all BoD members to vote on the
+1, although deputies may not be mandatory.
Best,
Charles.
Le 29 oct. 2011 23:49, Olivier Hallot
olivier.hal...@documentfoundation.org a écrit :
+1
Em 29-10-2011 14:47, Florian Effenberger escreveu:
Hello,
following today's SC/BoD phone conference, I'd hereby like to propose,
based on
23 matches
Mail list logo
