Agreed but the problem is if lets say OOo have the rather buggy writer
available and its free. which do you think people would prefer to go with?
On 09/04/2011 00:35, Laurence Jeloudev wrote:
Even if you had to pay for the apps it would help gain revenue for LO
in the mobile market especially
If LO didn't have any bugs and it worked very well compared to the
free version of a bugged OO that had many problems then people would
choose to buy LO because obviously they see the benefits of using a
free version on there desktop of LO that doesn't have many bugs that
are as bad as OO so they
For Android and iPhone it doesn't make sense to have the whole LO, only
Clac, Writer Impress are needed urgently!
If LO manages to place those three apps for Android, ODF will gain momentum.
Cheers!
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 21:01, todd rme toddrme2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2011 18:19, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
http://tomtasche.at/p/OpenOffice%20Document%20Reader#article
That program has not opened any of my ODT documents.
Reading the marketplace comments, it looks like it can only open
documents that are
On 8 April 2011 19:06, Jaime R. Garza gar...@gmail.com wrote:
For Android and iPhone it doesn't make sense to have the whole LO, only
Clac, Writer Impress are needed urgently!
Probably only Writer and Calc and an Impress viewer in the first instance.
Snag is Uno. Replacing Uno with a web
Even if you had to pay for the apps it would help gain revenue for LO
in the mobile market especially for iOS.
Sent from my iPhone
On 09/04/2011, at 5:17 AM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 April 2011 19:06, Jaime R. Garza gar...@gmail.com wrote:
For Android and iPhone it doesn't
If one c++ compiler already exists then wouldnt it be easy as just telling
the compiler to compile?
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:36 AM, toki toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/04/2011 14:43, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
How much of LO would need to be
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
eagles051...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:36 AM, toki toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/04/2011 14:43, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
How much of LO would need to be ported since android is linux based as
is?
Basically, it needs to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/04/2011 00:05, MiguelAngel wrote:
to waste the efforts to get Libo or OOo runing in Android or similar, and use
in a four-six inches windows, for to do what?
My little android device has more RAM, more file storage space, a faster
chip, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/2011 22:11, Denny wrote:
When pointing out competitors, there are a lot more I think.
One I would add to the list is
Softmaker Office (http://www.softmaker.com)
Looking at the app marketplace for my Android device.
* Documents To Go;
I have a statement from Thinkfree, that they will support ODF in the next
version.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:35, toki toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/2011 22:11, Denny wrote:
When pointing out competitors, there are a lot more I think.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/04/2011 10:59, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
I have a statement from Thinkfree, that they will support ODF in the next
version.
I'll believe that _after_ the next version is released.
With ThinkFree, their claims and the actuality are, in my
How much of LO would need to be ported since android is linux based as is?
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:25 PM, toki toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/04/2011 10:59, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
I have a statement from Thinkfree, that they will support
For me, there is no sense in the discussion, in a couple of years or
less, the new phones will have the power to run any OS, like Linux or
Windows, surely they can now.
It's the better way, to waste the efforts to get Libo or OOo runing in
Android or similar, and use in a four-six inches windows,
In data giovedì 31 marzo 2011 17:32:45, Jaime R. Garza ha scritto:
Hello Stefan ,
disadvise?
It's not about advise or not, is about platform-independence!
Thinkfree has great compatibility with MS formats (still the
defacto-standards) and runs in all platforms including Android and
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:53, Valter Mura valterm...@gmail.com wrote:
In data giovedì 31 marzo 2011 17:32:45, Jaime R. Garza ha scritto:
Please, don't top quote.
This said, are any of you involved in business? If so, maybe you use a
Blackberry phone.
So let's start to think to create
Hello Jaime,
Le Sun, 3 Apr 2011 12:16:48 +0200,
Jaime R. Garza gar...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:53, Valter Mura valterm...@gmail.com
wrote:
In data giovedì 31 marzo 2011 17:32:45, Jaime R. Garza ha scritto:
Please, don't top quote.
This said, are any of you
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 15:54, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hello Jaime,
Le Sun, 3 Apr 2011 12:16:48 +0200,
Jaime R. Garza gar...@gmail.com a écrit :
If you work for such a large corporation/entity, then perhaps your
employer would be interested in
When pointing out competitors, there are a lot more I think.
One I would add to the list is
Softmaker Office (http://www.softmaker.com)
Denny
Am Donnerstag, 31. März 2011, 15:39:17 schrieb Jaime R. Garza:
Dear all,
I have read that some of you believe there are no other true competitors to
Hi,
Am 31.03.2011 15:39, schrieb Jaime R. Garza:
The name of this Office Suite is: Thinkfree http://www.thinkfree.com/
(1) It does not support the ISO Standard for document file formats,
does it?
(2) It is proprietary software, isn't?
For me, two heavy reasons to disadvise this software. ;-)
Hello Stefan ,
disadvise?
It's not about advise or not, is about platform-independence!
Thinkfree has great compatibility with MS formats (still the
defacto-standards) and runs in all platforms including Android and iOS.
The advise here is that LO developers should try to focus on making those
Hi,
interesting discussion.
Am 31.03.2011 17:32, schrieb Jaime R. Garza:
disadvise?
Well, I consistently advise to use free software (not freeware!) and
open standards.
Thinkfree has great compatibility with MS formats (still the
defacto-standards)
Hm. The fact, that most people are using
On 31/03/2011 17:51, Stefan Weigel wrote:
Hi,
interesting discussion.
Am 31.03.2011 17:32, schrieb Jaime R. Garza:
disadvise?
Well, I consistently advise to use free software (not freeware!) and
open standards.
Thinkfree has great compatibility with MS formats (still the
23 matches
Mail list logo
