the answer is).
Thank you again for your care and your expertise.
Best Regards.
M.
- Mail original -
De: "Italo Vignoli" <it...@libreoffice.org>
À: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 28 Avril 2016 14:37:08
Objet: Re: [tdf-discuss] OOXML ECMA-376, transiti
On 28/04/2016 09:15, mjollni...@laposte.net wrote:
> The question is, how do we enforce the rules with the greatest
> efficiency possible.
Unfortunately, interoperability is strictly related to the user
behaviour, and should become a topic for students in schools. Users
should learn how to
-
De: "Italo Vignoli" <it...@libreoffice.org>
À: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Envoyé: Mercredi 27 Avril 2016 19:39:14
Objet: Re: [tdf-discuss] OOXML ECMA-376, transitionnal and strict
On 26/04/2016 12:46, mjollni...@laposte.net wrote:
Is it correct to say that the Transition
On 28/04/2016 01:39, Italo Vignoli wrote:
I do not know, as I am not a developer. I have configured my instance of
LibreOffice to replace Calibri and Cambria with Carlito and Caladea
(there is a replacement table in Options > LibreOffice > Fonts). I will
ask developers is this specific
di 27 Avril 2016 19:39:14
Objet: Re: [tdf-discuss] OOXML ECMA-376, transitionnal and strict
On 26/04/2016 12:46, mjollni...@laposte.net wrote:
> Is it correct to say that the Transitionnal OOXML format is not
> compliant with any international standard or norm ? Neither ECMA, nor
>
>> If you are promoting LO because it provides better interoperability,
>> shouldn't they be configured as equivalents? You could even prompt users
>> on save. Would this break something?
> I do not know, as I am not a developer. I have configured my instance of
> LibreOffice to replace Calibri
On 27/04/2016 21:57, Italo Vignoli wrote:
In fact, they are provided as equivalents, although the software is not
configured to handle them as equivalents.
If you are promoting LO because it provides better interoperability,
shouldn't they be configured as equivalents? You could even prompt
On 27/04/2016 22:55, Simon Phipps wrote:
> In fact it makes me wonder if these could be the default equivalents for
> the C-fonts in LibreOffice?
In fact, they are provided as equivalents, although the software is not
configured to handle them as equivalents.
--
Italo Vignoli - LibreOffice
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Mike Hall wrote:
> On 27/04/2016 21:18, Italo Vignoli wrote:
>
>> By using C-Fonts, you are therefore producing documents with limited
>> interoperability
>> C-Fonts are not interoperable also in technical terms,
>>
> That's good
On 27/04/2016 21:18, Italo Vignoli wrote:
By using C-Fonts, you are therefore producing documents with limited
interoperability
C-Fonts are not interoperable also in technical terms,
That's good information.
Does TDF have a recommendation for which fonts to use to maximise
interoperability
Yes, the fonts come with Windows, but not with other operating systems.
On MacOS, they are legally available with MS Office installed. On Linux,
they are not available at all.
C-Fonts cannot be legally embedded, although they can be mechanically
embedded (and no one warns you about the legal
On 27/04/2016 13:42, Italo Vignoli wrote:
Several people at TDF have been involved in the decision process and
have contributed specific evidence about ODF and OOXML
I zapped your last message, but I wondered whether it was necessary to
have an MSO licence to use Calibri etc. This windows PC,
On 26/04/2016 12:46, mjollni...@laposte.net wrote:
> Is it correct to say that the Transitionnal OOXML format is not
> compliant with any international standard or norm ? Neither ECMA, nor
> ISO, nor anything but MS$ itself.
OOXML Transitional is not the standard format, but a tweaked version of
On 27/04/2016 10:12, pasqual milvaques wrote:
> In the sake of documenting this, the UK Cabinet Office decision can be
> found here:
> https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-standards-for-government/sharing-or-collaborating-with-government-documents
Several people at TDF have been
Hi
In the sake of documenting this, the UK Cabinet Office decision can be
found here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-standards-for-government/sharing-or-collaborating-with-government-documents
In this URL there is addditional information about the supoport process:
On 26/04/2016 15:09, pasqual milvaques wrote:
> The 'transitional' variant of ooxml is specified in Part 4 of ISO/IEC
> 29500 so it's standard, it's supposed that the features of the
> transitional variant ease the transition from older formats, I'm not
> sure if there is a plan for making the
?
If so, would please somebody advice me the best place to post the question ?
- Mail original -
De: "Florian Reisinger" <flo...@libreoffice.org>
À: mjollni...@laposte.net, discuss@documentfoundation.org
Envoyé: Mardi 26 Avril 2016 13:26:12
Objet: Re: [tdf-discuss
the best place to post the question ?
- Mail original -
De: "Florian Reisinger" <flo...@libreoffice.org>
À: mjollni...@laposte.net, discuss@documentfoundation.org
Envoyé: Mardi 26 Avril 2016 13:26:12
Objet: Re: [tdf-discuss] OOXML ECMA-376, transitionnal and strict
Short answer: Any release (2007,2010,2013,2016) has it's own transitional
format. AFAIK
schrieb am Di., 26. Apr. 2016, 10:13:
> Hello,
>
> I'm a french user willing to get some answers about OOXML format.
> This post is already released on the fr.discuss mailing list.
>
19 matches
Mail list logo