Thanh,
what options do we have to add gerrit links to bugs - basically the reverse
of how adding a bug id to the commit message creates a link back to the
bug? We would like to have gerrit automatically populate bugzilla with the
gerrit link. Further integration woudl be to assign the bug based
Robert, Tom,
where do we stand on reverting
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/49265/ ? From the emails below from
Jamo and Luis that one patch has caused major regressions in the clustering
csit.
This is the same discussion in thread [1]. Robert you have identified many
exceptions in the
Jamo, Thanh,
was there ever a time when a commit on one project would trigger a
dependent project build?
We have cases where Netvirt depends on Genius code and a Netvirt UT would
catch any problems. Seems like I remember the infra used to be this way
that a project verify job would also trigger
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Casey Cain
wrote:
> Zoom has a very powerful and easy to use platform for moving licences
> between accounts.
> Moving a licence day to day to different users only takes a few clicks.
> While it does add an extra minute of overhead to
Slides for the presentation today:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/16kvBFqHJTHbsA0XhA0fou844pDRQL
8pl38Mf9N1lNo8/edit#slide=id.p3
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Casey Cain
wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> This is a reminder that today, Andre will presenting on
Michael,
so if I understand correctly, projects that are already using checkstyle
with error setting, do not have to switch to odlparent 3.0.0 until they are
ready? Or is there some point at which the projects much upgrade to 3.0.0
and be forced to make the checkstyle changes? I recall the effort
Look for the externalid field in jira. It has the bugzilla id. Create a
search filter and save it.
Andy is also working on getting the links in gerrits to go to the jira
issues same as we had for bugzillas. Until then we paste the full jira url
in the commit message.
On Nov 25, 2017 5:21 AM,
+1 to 8:30a, 9:00a or 10:00a
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 7:00 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> During the TSC meeting today one of the topics discussed was the meeting
> time. Some folks were of the opinion that it maybe useful for folks in
> Europe and India if
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Thanh Ha
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:42 AM Lori Jakab
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:34 AM Abhijit Kumbhare
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I believe we decided to keep the test and ignore the failures - last
>>> item in the list. i.e. we did not decide to
sen <jluhr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> my vote, which is worth 0.02 is for "JIRA: NETVIRT-1234"
>>
>> JamO
>>
>> On 4/16/18 8:22 AM, Anil Vishnoi wrote:
>>
>>> No strong preference, but throwing one more option
>>>
>>> Resol
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Daniel Farrell
wrote:
> Bumping this thread because we really need to get to a resolution ASAP,
> folks need to book travel.
>
> The options I've seen:
>
> 1. DDF on Thursday/Friday before ONS. Very long trip, but no conflicts.
> 2. DDF on
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 17, 2018 5:58 AM
> *To:* Jamo Luhrsen <jluhr...@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Stephen Kitt <sk...@redhat.com>; OpenDaylight Discuss <
> discuss@lists.opendaylight.org>; Release (rele...@lists.opendaylight.org)
> <rele...@lists.opendaylight.org&
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Sam Hague <sha...@redhat.com> wrote:
> What is the preferred or suggested best practice for service level
> configuration? There are two methods we have been using and would like to
> know the pros and cons of each. Genius and NetVirt went with the b
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Tom Pantelis <tompante...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:56 AM, Sam Hague <sha...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Sam Hague <sha...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:05 AM Thanh Ha
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> We got the OpenDaylight namespace officially registered as a group on
> Freenode in the past week. What this means is it allows LF Staff to take
> control of any #opendaylight-* prefixed channel on Freenode in order to
> manage
+1
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 6:16 PM, Luis Gomez wrote:
> +1
>
> On Jan 23, 2018, at 3:07 PM, An Ho wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Best Regards,
> An Ho
>
> *From:* tsc-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:tsc-bounces@lists.
> opendaylight.org
Curious if we know if performance will drop as it did when we moved gerrit
over to AWS? We get a "working" status many times with gerrit in AWS. I
think the issue was with the DNS queries. But it takes seconds for the gui
to move from action to action.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Rob Garth
What would the workflow be with the new jira and gerrit integration? And
what best-practices should be used when creating commit messages?
Typically users have included the bug-id in the beginning of the summary
line. That eats up some of the 50 characters allowed so it isn't good.
Should we
imb...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On 04/05/2018 09:32 AM, Sam Hague wrote:
> > What would the workflow be with the new jira and gerrit integration? And
> > what best-practices should be used when creating commit messages?
> >
> > Typically users have inc
gt;> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Sam Hague <sha...@redhat.com
> > <mailto:sha...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > What would the workflow be with the new jira and gerrit
> > integration?
up in autorelease -
unless maybe Daniel's query was from carbon. From oxygen on the -ui piece
is not built.
>
> JamO
>
> On 3/28/18 1:14 PM, Sam Hague wrote:
>
>> netvirt has removed the building of the dlux ui feature already so
>> archiving is fine with netvirt.
&
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 5:24 PM Tom Pantelis wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 4:13 PM Sam Hague wrote:
>
>> Any idea if there is a portable java method that can take json as input
>> and output java objects? Or some example code that maybe isn't as generic,
>&g
Parul,
did you look at Tim's dlux and dlux-apps branches to see what changes he
made to get dlux to compile for fluorine? [1] and [2] are the branches.
Other question is you mentioned odlparent 4.0.9. That means you are trying
master (sodium) branch and not fluorine. [3] is what we use for
-
From: parulagrawal14
Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 10:01 PM
Subject: Re: [shague/opendaylight-ansible] Compilation Error (#19)
To: shague/opendaylight-ansible
Cc: Sam Hague , Comment
Hi Sam,
Thanks for your reply. As suggested I tried to compile dluxapp for
fluorine by updating the version
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 8:14 AM Parul Agrawal
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I downloaded fluorine sr2 from
> https://docs.opendaylight.org/en/stable-fluorine/downloads.html, but i
> could not find ansible feature in this release.
>
Yes, you will only find features from the Managed and Self-Managed
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 8:19 AM Robert Varga wrote:
> On 30/01/2019 15:30, Sam Hague wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 5:03 AM > <mailto:guillaume.lamb...@orange.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Stephen
> >
> > I am shar
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 5:03 AM wrote:
> Hi Stephen
>
> I am sharing your feedback and thinks it would make a lot of sense.
> Many linux distros use something similar to deal with staging packages in
> their repo, e.g. Fedora with stable/branched/rawhide repos or Debian with
>
sed it is locked, stopped
jobs and eventually removed and you only have the sr1 branch left. It is
only during this code freeze to release that the stable branch would last
since you have the sr1 branch at the same time which would be the longer
living branch.
>
> Regards,
> Thanh
>
> On
-
From: parulagrawal14
Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 10:01 PM
Subject: Re: [shague/opendaylight-ansible] Compilation Error (#19)
To: shague/opendaylight-ansible
Cc: Sam Hague , Comment
Hi Sam,
Thanks for your reply. As suggested I tried to compile dluxapp for
fluorine by updating the version
29 matches
Mail list logo