Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind

...@frogmouth.net Cc: 'OSGeo Discussions' <discuss@lists.osgeo.org> Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind Brad, As I tried to make clear from the beginning, we are very glad to contribute, by providing ^supported^ access to our experience going down the GeoPackage road. We jus

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind

2:53 PM To: Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) Cc: 'OSGeo Discussions' Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind OK. So the answer to my original question of " Can I ask if there are any plans to contribute back the forked geoserver and geotools parts?” that NASA does not currently plan to

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind

rsday, 15 February 2018 9:40 AM To: br...@frogmouth.net Cc: 'OSGeo Discussions' <discuss@lists.osgeo.org> Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind Brad, Life is work! We have not suggested “changes. . .just be taken from WWSK.” We have done quite a bit of work to get

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind

(ARC-PX) Cc: 'OSGeo Discussions' Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind Just so we’re clear – the geopackage stuff in WWSK is a fork of (i.e. copy from) the community modules in geotools and geoserver. For example, see https://github.com/NASAWorldWind/WorldWindServerKit/blob/develop

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind

th.net; OSGeo Discussions <discuss@lists.osgeo.org> Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind Our GeoPackage work to facilitate that via GeoServer is extensive and carefully architected. And we’ve discovered some other good things that would certainly advance GeoServer. <htt

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind

; OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind Switching this to the GeoServer Devel list. We always encourage people to discuss major changes to GeoServer to discuss them here before they start as there is a much better chance of it being accepted into the code base

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind

who would take the lead in that effort. > > > > -Patrick > > > > *From:* Ian Turton [mailto:ijtur...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 14, 2018 7:56 AM > > *To:* Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) > *Cc:* br...@frogmouth.net; OSGeo Discussions > *Subject:* Re: [OSGeo-

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind

; OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind You know that the latest GeoServers use GeoPackages as core datastores? See http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Crazy-idea-what-about-GeoPackage-straight-in-core-for-2-12-td5329361.html for the discussion. But please do pitch

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind

t:* Wednesday, February 14, 2018 5:54 AM > *To:* Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) > *Cc:* br...@frogmouth.net; OSGeo Discussions > *Subject:* Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind > > > > > Actually, that would be the GeoTools and GeoServer Programme > Steering/Managemen

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind

) 604-5656 (o) (650) 269-2788 (c) From: Ian Turton [mailto:ijtur...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 5:54 AM To: Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) Cc: br...@frogmouth.net; OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind Actually, that would be the GeoTools and GeoServer

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind

3:36 AM > To: Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX); 'OSGeo Discussions' > Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind > > Hello Patrick, > > Can I ask if there are any plans to contribute back the forked geoserver > and geotools parts? > > Brad > > > __

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind

, February 14, 2018 3:36 AM To: Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX); 'OSGeo Discussions' Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind Hello Patrick, Can I ask if there are any plans to contribute back the forked geoserver and geotools parts? Brad ___ Discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind

Hello Patrick, Can I ask if there are any plans to contribute back the forked geoserver and geotools parts? Brad ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

[OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind

Dear OSGeo & GeoForAll, Please indulge me three (3) points to make here (again), (1) the ESA-NASA collaboration on WebWorldWind, (2) the Explorer ^starter app^ and (3) the WorldWindServerKit (GeoServer) with integrated layer viewer, the Explorer (again). (1) ESA-NASA Collaboration ESA

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind

[mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 10:27 PM To: Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) Cc: OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind Thanks Patrick, glad to see NASA having success with open source. If you, or your team, interested in listing these projects on our

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind

Thanks Patrick for sharing these excellent updates with the community. Best wishes, Suchith From: GeoForAll on behalf of Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) Sent: 16 January 2018 16:29 To: OSGeo Discussions;

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind

Thanks Patrick, glad to see NASA having success with open source. If you, or your team, interested in listing these projects on or website please ask. On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 8:29 AM Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) < patrick.ho...@nasa.gov> wrote: > Dear OSGeo & GeoForAll, > > > > Please indulge me

[OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind

Dear OSGeo & GeoForAll, Please indulge me three (3) points to make here, (1) the ESA-NASA collaboration on WebWorldWind, (2) the Explorer ^starter app^ and (3) the WorldWindServerKit (GeoServer) with integrated layer viewer, the Explorer (again). (1) ESA-NASA Collaboration ESA and NASA