Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Test polygons from About Invalid, Valid and Clean Polygons

2013-11-14 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Hi Wilko,

Thank you!

Your post has been forwarded to OSGeo-Discuss:
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2013-November/012529.html

Regards,
Mateusz

On 14 November 2013 15:16, Wilko Quak c.w.q...@tudelft.nl wrote:
 Hi All,

 Maybe it's a bit late but I found the PostGIS sql script that we used 10
 years ago. I'll attach the old script that we used at the time. With a
 little bit of work it should run on a current version of PostGIS.

 Best wishes, Wilko Quak

 Ps. I cannot send messages to the OSGeo-Discuss mailing list, so if the
 discussion is still relevant could someone forward it?



 On 27 October 2013 22:04, Wilko Quak c.w.q...@tudelft.nl wrote:

 Hi All,

 The paper is from 2005

 Yes, that's what Springer says:

 http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F3-540-26772-7_1

 and uses PostGIS 0.6.2.

 I see,  I missed that important detail.

 I am not sure whether PostGIS
 had an ST_IsValid function at the time. Anyway when I am back in the
 office
 I'll try to find the original scripts.

 That would be helpful, thanks!

 Best regards,





-- 
Mateusz  Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Test polygons from About Invalid, Valid and Clean Polygons

2013-10-30 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Hi,

It seems that Peter van Oosterom's e-mail with the SQL script attachment
hasn't made it to the Discuss list, so I'm forwarding it here.

Mat

On 30 October 2013 20:45, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote:
 Hi Mateusz,

 the scripts weren't added... SVN hosting might be the best?

 ciao
 Markus

 On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
 On 28 October 2013 00:31, Peter van Oosterom - OTB - TBM
 p.j.m.vanooste...@tudelft.nl wrote:
 Dear all,

 Quite sure the results are correct for PostGIS.
 The work was done in first half of 2003; see publication pdf's on 
 http://www.gdmc.nl/publications/
 PostGIS (and others) did much improve the years shortly after!
 Please find attached the test script.

 Peter,

 Not commenting on PostGIS capabilities at that time, but thank you
 very much for the scripts!

 Best regards,
 --
 Mateusz  Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
 ___
 Discuss mailing list
 Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss



-- 
Mateusz  Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net


postgis_polygons.sql
Description: Binary data
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Test polygons from About Invalid, Valid and Clean Polygons

2013-10-28 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 28 October 2013 00:31, Peter van Oosterom - OTB - TBM
p.j.m.vanooste...@tudelft.nl wrote:
 Dear all,

 Quite sure the results are correct for PostGIS.
 The work was done in first half of 2003; see publication pdf's on 
 http://www.gdmc.nl/publications/
 PostGIS (and others) did much improve the years shortly after!
 Please find attached the test script.

Peter,

Not commenting on PostGIS capabilities at that time, but thank you
very much for the scripts!

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz  Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Test polygons from About Invalid, Valid and Clean Polygons

2013-10-27 Thread Paul Ramsey
What’s the publication date on this? The PostGIS results are wrong, at least in 
that they only show the input validation (PostGIS will accept almost any WKT 
input, with the exception of unclosed rings) and not ST_IsValid validation.

P.

On Oct 25, 2013, at 5:47 PM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:

 Hi,
 
 In the paper About Invalid, Valid and Clean Polygons [1], on page 11,
 there is a collection of test polygons used by the authors.
 
 Does anyone happen to know where can I find a complete dataset or
 a form of data definition (WKT, GML, etc.)  with those test polygons?
 
 [1] 
 http://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/9783540226109-c1.pdf
 
 Best regards,
 -- 
 Mateusz  Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
 ___
 Discuss mailing list
 Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Test polygons from About Invalid, Valid and Clean Polygons

2013-10-27 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 27 October 2013 22:04, Wilko Quak c.w.q...@tudelft.nl wrote:
 Hi All,

 The paper is from 2005

Yes, that's what Springer says:

http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F3-540-26772-7_1

 and uses PostGIS 0.6.2.

I see,  I missed that important detail.

 I am not sure whether PostGIS
 had an ST_IsValid function at the time. Anyway when I am back in the office
 I'll try to find the original scripts.

That would be helpful, thanks!

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz  Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[OSGeo-Discuss] Test polygons from About Invalid, Valid and Clean Polygons

2013-10-25 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Hi,

In the paper About Invalid, Valid and Clean Polygons [1], on page 11,
there is a collection of test polygons used by the authors.

Does anyone happen to know where can I find a complete dataset or
a form of data definition (WKT, GML, etc.)  with those test polygons?

[1] 
http://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/9783540226109-c1.pdf

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz  Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss