Hi Wilko,
Thank you!
Your post has been forwarded to OSGeo-Discuss:
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2013-November/012529.html
Regards,
Mateusz
On 14 November 2013 15:16, Wilko Quak c.w.q...@tudelft.nl wrote:
Hi All,
Maybe it's a bit late but I found the PostGIS sql script that we
Hi,
It seems that Peter van Oosterom's e-mail with the SQL script attachment
hasn't made it to the Discuss list, so I'm forwarding it here.
Mat
On 30 October 2013 20:45, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote:
Hi Mateusz,
the scripts weren't added... SVN hosting might be the best?
ciao
On 28 October 2013 00:31, Peter van Oosterom - OTB - TBM
p.j.m.vanooste...@tudelft.nl wrote:
Dear all,
Quite sure the results are correct for PostGIS.
The work was done in first half of 2003; see publication pdf's on
http://www.gdmc.nl/publications/
PostGIS (and others) did much improve the
What’s the publication date on this? The PostGIS results are wrong, at least in
that they only show the input validation (PostGIS will accept almost any WKT
input, with the exception of unclosed rings) and not ST_IsValid validation.
P.
On Oct 25, 2013, at 5:47 PM, Mateusz Loskot
On 27 October 2013 22:04, Wilko Quak c.w.q...@tudelft.nl wrote:
Hi All,
The paper is from 2005
Yes, that's what Springer says:
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F3-540-26772-7_1
and uses PostGIS 0.6.2.
I see, I missed that important detail.
I am not sure whether PostGIS
had an
