Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] The Geotools fork and current relicensing discussion [was Re: The importance of a project's license]

2012-07-27 Thread Jeff McKenna
On 12-07-27 3:09 PM, Adrian Custer wrote: [2] I personally find the failure to make Martin a charter member as one glaring indictment of OSGeo and its community, revealing the inwards looking favoritism and lack of exploration beyond. There are few people as passionate, knowledgeable, or

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] The Geotools fork and current relicensing discussion [was Re: The importance of a project's license]

2012-07-27 Thread Alex Mandel
On 07/27/2012 11:09 AM, Adrian Custer wrote: Third, the decision strikes me as between honoring the intent of contributors to Geotools 2.6 and honoring the desire of the Geotoolkit contributors to take forwards their code base and build a community after having been rejected by OSGeo.

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] The Geotools fork and current relicensing discussion [was Re: The importance of a project's license]

2012-07-27 Thread Justin Deoliveira
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Adrian Custer acus...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, On 7/27/12 12:55 AM, Alex Mandel wrote: This is a really interesting debate. Reading the links provided it also appears to be a mixed bag about acceptance of LGPL of various firms and I'm also sure