Chris and Dave are right, I'd strongly suggest using a less restrictive
license than GPL as you will likely increase your developer base.
Dave McIlhagga wrote:
On 23-Jun-08, at 11:40 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Bjorn Sandvik ha scritto:
I'll consider the pros and cons between different
- Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 05:40:41PM +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Bjorn Sandvik ha scritto:
I'll consider the pros and cons between different licenses. I
don't have
commercial interests,
but I would like the
Bjorn Sandvik wrote:
Thanks for your feedback.
I'll consider the pros and cons between different licenses. I don't have
commercial interests,
but I would like the project to be sustainable.
I've changed my mind about using SourceForge, - I agree that Google Code
is more suitable.
Just as
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Arnulf Christl wrote:
Just as a side note: Google has been overly submissive to US Export
Regulations and rejects requests from IPs that can be traced to a location
within an country that falls under their export ban list. Unfortunately the
same
- Christopher Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Arnulf Christl wrote:
Just as a side note: Google has been overly submissive to US Export
Regulations and rejects requests from IPs that can be traced to a
location
within an country that falls
] Thematic Mapping Engine as Open Source?
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Arnulf Christl wrote:
Just as a side note: Google has been overly submissive to US Export
Regulations and rejects requests from IPs that can be traced to a location
within an country that falls under their export
2008/6/24 Christopher Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Arnulf Christl wrote:
Just as a side note: Google has been overly submissive to US Export
Regulations and rejects requests from IPs that can be traced to a location
within an country that falls under
Chris Puttick wrote:
- Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 05:40:41PM +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Bjorn Sandvik ha scritto:
I'll consider the pros and cons between different licenses. I
don't have
commercial interests,
but I would
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:01:25AM +0100, Bjorn Sandvik wrote:
My plan is to release TME as an open source project under a GNU GPL
license v3, and use SourceForge as a code repository.
Is there a strong reason behind these choices? These days, I probably
wouldnt' go with either of them,
Thanks for your feedback.
I'll consider the pros and cons between different licenses. I don't have
commercial interests,
but I would like the project to be sustainable.
I've changed my mind about using SourceForge, - I agree that Google Code
is more suitable.
Regards,
Bjørn
Christopher
Bjorn Sandvik ha scritto:
I'll consider the pros and cons between different licenses. I don't have
commercial interests,
but I would like the project to be sustainable.
I've changed my mind about using SourceForge, - I agree that Google Code
is more suitable.
Please note:
- GPL is more
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 05:40:41PM +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Bjorn Sandvik ha scritto:
I'll consider the pros and cons between different licenses. I don't have
commercial interests,
but I would like the project to be sustainable.
I've changed my mind about using SourceForge, - I
Dave McIlhagga ha scritto:
Similarly there are many good reasons for the long-term sustainability
of the project to embrace a more open license such as the BSD which
welcomes all participants - even if they have proprietary commercial
interest. We avoid GPL like the plague for exactly this
On 6/23/08, Christopher Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 05:40:41PM +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Bjorn Sandvik ha scritto:
I'll consider the pros and cons between different licenses. I don't have
commercial interests,
but I would like the project to be
14 matches
Mail list logo
