Not sure where my comments would fit into the conversation, so please
forgive me in advance for responding on top instead of within the thread.
I think the topic of next steps is a great idea. I think the topic of
modifying the current logic is rather premature. We don't have enough data
On 12/22/2016 06:50 PM, Jason Harrer wrote:
> Not sure where my comments would fit into the conversation, so please
> forgive me in advance for responding on top instead of within the thread.
> I think the topic of next steps is a great idea. I think the topic of
> modifying the current logic
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Stephen Michel
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Bryan Richter
Now that the reboot of the site is operational, I think it's time to
start at the top and work our way down to our next immediate goals.
On 12/22/2016 02:14 PM, Stephen Michel wrote:
> Although we need to think beyond MVP, we still need to limit our scope.
> I am including the following because it strengthens the argument for
> this system.
> Please ONLY discuss it insofar as it relates to "should we adopt the
> system?". Do
To summarize some IRC thoughts I wrote:
I think the appeal of set goals for money and patrons is understandable
but problematic. Projects and patrons are *shitty* at determining these
things. The majority of patrons will be *wrong* about their predictions
about how they'll feel about their budget