Re: [Discuss] [Funding Mechanism] How to accommodate lower and higher pledge levels

2015-10-21 Thread Bryan Richter
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:54:49AM -0400, Stephen Michel wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:36 AM, mray wrote: >> >> Here is my general rationale: The idea of Snowdrift is that it >> has its own pace to up the game of donation levels, depending >> on number of patrons. Our

Re: [Discuss] Pricing experiments & launch timeframe

2015-10-21 Thread Bryan Richter
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:44:55PM -0200, Dave Crossland wrote: >Could the project sooner bootstrap itself with a mostly manual, >spreadsheet based calculation? This is a thought-provoking question, and one I am happy to be reminded of whenever it seems relevant. In this case I'm not

Re: [Discuss] Thoughts on pledge matching

2015-10-19 Thread Bryan Richter
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:44:34AM -0700, Jonathan Roberts wrote: >These things may have been discussed already, but these are >initial thoughts from friends looking at the system; ie >theoretical potential patrons. > >1)It will make the average person nervous to not see a very

Re: [Discuss] [Legal] Thoughts on pledge matching

2015-10-19 Thread Bryan Richter
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:46:25AM -0700, Jonathan Roberts wrote: >related to #2. Is there an option for an "upper limit?" A person can say >"I want to give to this but I can't go above $5 a month and I don't want >to have to drop out or be constantly re-adjusting my pledge rate." >

Re: [Discuss] Fwd: What makes a team member?

2015-10-19 Thread Bryan Richter
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:04:33AM -0700, Jonathan Roberts wrote: > >Paying a member fee is an interesting thought. I guess I hadn't >considered that. I have been mostly thinking that it makes sense >to give full time staff, payed or not, special representation on >the board. In

Re: [Discuss] Flagging comments in the forum

2015-10-19 Thread Bryan Richter
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:40:04AM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote: > > On 10/19/2015 11:14 AM, Jonathan Roberts wrote: > > I don't like the way flagging is currently presented in the forum. To > > check a box that labels another comment as "defensiveness" or "hate > > speech" has a lot of potential for

Re: [Discuss] Launch ready issues

2015-10-20 Thread Bryan Richter
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 03:16:17PM -0700, Jonathan Roberts wrote: > >3)have all graphics and coding actually loaded (not sure this is the right >term) on the live site so we can test for bugs. This one is bigger than one might think. Will discuss more shortly, probably on the dev mailing

Re: [Discuss] Sprints?

2015-10-20 Thread Bryan Richter
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 03:37:10PM -0400, Stephen Michel wrote: >On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Jason Harrer >wrote: > > If we keep changing everything and second guessing and changing > everything, we're never going to launch. > >This is a really

Re: [Discuss] Agree on a Slogan

2015-09-17 Thread Bryan Richter
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 06:02:52PM -0600, Peter Harpending wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 09:50:13PM +0200, mray wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > So here is my candidate: > > > > > > "WE FUND FREE CULTURE." > > > > WE indicates that it is about people (many!), maybe including you >

[Snowdrift-discuss] UX questions for password reset

2016-06-03 Thread Bryan Richter
There are two situations where I'm not sure what the best action is. 1. A visitor tries to create an account using an email address that already exists. Do we tell the visitor what the situation is? On the one hand, it provides potentially useful feedback. On the other hand, it

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] UX questions for password reset

2016-06-14 Thread Bryan Richter
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:06:13PM -0400, Stephen Michel wrote: > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote: > >On 06/04/2016 06:56 AM, Stephen Michel wrote: > >> > >> On June 4, 2016 5:21:31 AM EDT, mray wrote: > >>> > >>> On 04.06.

[Snowdrift-discuss] chreekat in Seattle on June 3rd

2016-05-26 Thread Bryan Richter
Anybody around to meet up on Friday the 3rd before I take the bus home at 4:00pm? I'm going to Seattle to attend a friend's event on the evening of the 2nd. I'll be available the next day, Friday the 3rd, any time (morning or afternoon) up to 4pm. -Bryan signature.asc Description: Digital

[Snowdrift-discuss] greetings from Finland

2016-06-22 Thread Bryan Richter
Hi all, Today was my first real day in Finland, and happily I was able to settle in and make some progress on Snowdrift. My internet situation is still getting squared away, but it should be good soon. I'm way out in the countryside, and I'm looking forward to many distraction-free hours over the

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] UX questions for password reset

2016-06-14 Thread Bryan Richter
By the way: https://tree.taiga.io/project/snowdrift/us/392 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.snowdrift.coop https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/discuss

[Discuss] Hatch — potential resource?

2016-02-12 Thread Bryan Richter
A note I managed to scribble down at SCaLE was about Hatch: http://www.hatchthefuture.org/hatch-a-new-social-enterprise/big-ideas/ It seems geared towards traditional capital-raising entrepreneurship, but the overlap still seems significant. Their top initiative is "Resources and guidance to get

[Discuss] fundingoss.com

2016-02-09 Thread Bryan Richter
I added us to http://fundingoss.com/ . I don't know how much good it will do, but at least it might catch some eyeballs of people who care about the same things we do. http://fundingoss.com/143/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Discuss

Re: [Discuss] OpenProject Work Packages Workflow

2016-02-11 Thread Bryan Richter
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 03:15:38PM -0800, Stephen Yeung wrote: > Regarding Milestones they're generally meant for big events (i.e. > launches or when you complete a suite of inter-related features) > wherein you take stock and review work and see if changes are > needed. Right now our two

Re: [Discuss] OpenProject Work Packages Workflow

2016-02-11 Thread Bryan Richter
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 04:25:08PM -0500, Stephen Michel wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Bryan Richter > <br...@snowdrift.coop> wrote: > >On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 03:15:38PM -0800, Stephen Yeung wrote: > >> Regarding Milestones they're generally meant for

[Discuss] shutting down our sandstorm instance

2016-01-28 Thread Bryan Richter
We primarily wanted Sandstorm for Etherpad. However, Etherpad is a node.js based, JIT-compiled application. Sandstorm's security model requires each document to be running in its own, sandboxed copy of the app, and the JIT-ness apparently precludes such applications from sharing memory. Thus, each

[Discuss] Sandstorm Etherpad is a memory hog

2016-01-27 Thread Bryan Richter
Each Etherpad pad uses 60-100MB of memory when someone has it open. Right now there are four open pads, using a total of 27% of the system's memory. I don't know if we can stand for that. Options? Thoughts? signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [Discuss] Sandstorm Etherpad is a memory hog

2016-01-27 Thread Bryan Richter
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 02:53:49PM -0800, Bryan Richter wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 02:45:20PM -0800, Aaron Wolf wrote: > > On 01/27/2016 02:29 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > > > Each Etherpad pad uses 60-100MB of memory when someone has it > > > open. Right now ther

Re: [Discuss] Sandstorm Etherpad is a memory hog

2016-01-27 Thread Bryan Richter
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 02:45:20PM -0800, Aaron Wolf wrote: > On 01/27/2016 02:29 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > > Each Etherpad pad uses 60-100MB of memory when someone has it > > open. Right now there are four open pads, using a total of 27% of > > the system's memory. > &

[Discuss] Meeting minutes 2016-02-01

2016-02-01 Thread Bryan Richter
Thanks to setting up OpenProject, we now have a perfectly reasonable place to record minutes for meetings. Here is what I came up with for today's meeting: http://shovel.snowdrift.coop/meetings/2 Any feedback on minutes format would be appreciated. Too terse? p.s. to Aaron, Jason, and any other

Re: [Discuss] Meeting minutes 2016-02-01

2016-02-01 Thread Bryan Richter
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 04:26:01PM -0800, Aaron Wolf wrote: > On 02/01/2016 03:36 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > > Thanks to setting up OpenProject, we now have a perfectly reasonable > > place to record minutes for meetings. Here is what I came up with for > > today's m

Re: [Discuss] OpenProject Agenda; Holocracy Circles / OpenProject Groups & Roles

2016-02-02 Thread Bryan Richter
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:00:10AM -0600, Jason Harrer wrote: > > 2) As I'm reviewing and investigating more about what OpenProject > can do and how we can organize things, I think it would be > beneficial to take the time to try and establish the groups and > roles and figuring out the workflow

Re: [Discuss] backlog grooming meeting on wednesday

2016-02-24 Thread Bryan Richter
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 05:08:37PM -0800, Aaron Wolf wrote: > On 02/23/2016 04:42 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 08:25:34PM -0800, Bryan Richter wrote: > > > > Based on the feedback I've received, we will have the grooming > > meeting at 14:

Re: [Discuss] backlog grooming meeting on wednesday

2016-02-23 Thread Bryan Richter
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 08:25:34PM -0800, Bryan Richter wrote: > Aaron has created a list of user stories to guide development of the > site. Some time on Wednesday, we're going to have our first "backlog > grooming meeting". This email is a call to participate. > > A

[Discuss] user stories vs specs

2016-02-26 Thread Bryan Richter
Yesterday while fleshing out user stories, the question came up of whether or not user stories can capture everything, or whether some information should be deferred to specs. In my opinion, separate specifications are needed because user stories only capture features. It is not a user story that

[Discuss] backlog grooming meeting on wednesday

2016-02-22 Thread Bryan Richter
Aaron has created a list of user stories to guide development of the site. Some time on Wednesday, we're going to have our first "backlog grooming meeting". This email is a call to participate. A backlog grooming meeting is where everyone with a stake will inspect the highest priority items and

Re: [Discuss] Possible visual aid for discussing whether Snowdrift.coop is a good fit for a project

2016-01-23 Thread Bryan Richter
Thanks! So far we're getting great feedback and support. Thanks so much for the design work and messaging work, all of you. The difference from presenting at previous events is palpable. On Jan 23, 2016 8:59 AM, "Michael Siepmann" wrote: > This is very much a first

Re: [Discuss] OpenProject Work Packages Workflow

2016-02-12 Thread Bryan Richter
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 03:03:38AM -0500, Stephen Michel wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Bryan Richter > <br...@snowdrift.coop> wrote: > >On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 04:25:08PM -0500, Stephen Michel wrote: > >> > >> Pre-Alpha (name?): complete

Re: [Discuss] OpenProject Work Packages Workflow

2016-02-12 Thread Bryan Richter
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 02:12:59PM -0800, Aaron Wolf wrote: > On 02/12/2016 02:00 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > > > > Hmm, yeah, maybe co-op/money/website are a lot more interdependent > > than I was thinking. That makes me wonder — what is the plan for > > co-op a

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] steps that lead to working mechanism

2016-03-01 Thread Bryan Richter
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:16:22PM -0800, Aaron Wolf wrote: > > So, I have a bigger concern to make sure we consider: Lots of things > currently reference user id such as links for sponsors and elsewhere > including CiviCRM. There are some reasons to dislike the way the > arbitrary id numbers are

[Snowdrift-discuss] Page development: current status

2016-03-14 Thread Bryan Richter
Below is a list of all the pages needed for launch. Aaron and I looked at most of them and brainstormed what they needed to be complete. I added completion percentage numbers to all of them, which are pleasant little fictions. What would be *lovely* is to somehow get this information added into

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Switching primary git repository

2016-03-21 Thread Bryan Richter
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 03:33:29PM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote: > On 03/21/2016 03:21 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > > Our project is well on its way through the process of changing the > > primary git repository away from git.gnu.io. > > > > Is git.gnu.io in

[Snowdrift-discuss] Sandstorm on Oasis

2016-03-24 Thread Bryan Richter
We've sort of put Sandstorm on a back burner, but I think there is a much better solution to consider: https://docs.sandstorm.io/en/latest/administering/for-work/#special-pricing Basically, we should just ask for free hosting on their managed service, Oasis. 1. We don't have to manage it at all

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] [Snowdrift-dev] [PATCH] User nicknames as public user IDs: Change UserR route

2016-03-07 Thread Bryan Richter
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 02:39:07PM -0800, Aaron Wolf wrote: > In this case, I'm fine with moving forward but only if it's otherwise > clean progress. Ok, if design is fine with it (which was expected) we come to a bigger problem. Right now I'm working to strip out unnecessary features and

[Snowdrift-discuss] Team list now publicly available

2016-03-31 Thread Bryan Richter
https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/team This mailing list is for two sorts of people: 1. Anyone filling a role as defined in the governance docs. These people are unmoderated. 2. Anyone else who is interested in the organizational machinations taking place "behind the scenes"[1].

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] [Snowdrift-dev] PSA: I assume you're also on the snowdrift discuss mailing list

2016-03-28 Thread Bryan Richter
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 11:41:50AM -0600, Peter Harpending wrote: > > If you would like me (and I assume many of us) to subscribe to the > discuss list, it needs to be about things of general interest, that > concern the majority of the community. Stuff about governance, > meetings, project

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] This coming week's meetings

2016-03-28 Thread Bryan Richter
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 07:04:26PM -0400, Stephen Michel wrote: > > 1. Weekly tactical meeting, on Monday. In the meeting, we'll be > prioritizing and grooming our backlog. I'd rather these be three separate meetings: tactical, prioritizing, grooming. The best scrum analogue to the tactical

[Snowdrift-discuss] Switching primary git repository

2016-03-21 Thread Bryan Richter
Our project is well on its way through the process of changing the primary git repository away from git.gnu.io. As sysadmin I am responsible for supporting that process, but I suppose I would be remiss if I did not also ask for justification for the process. Is git.gnu.io insufficient in some

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Let's take care of the blog

2016-05-18 Thread Bryan Richter
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:13:34PM -0600, Peter Harpending wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:21:23AM -0700, Bryan Richter wrote: > > Website work is blocked on taking care of the blog, so let's do that. > > We have to make some decisions, but first we need to agree on what

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Let's take care of the blog

2016-05-18 Thread Bryan Richter
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 09:22:46PM -0600, Michael Siepmann wrote: > > > On 05/18/2016 05:51 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:13:34PM -0600, Peter Harpending wrote: > >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:21:23AM -0700, Bryan Richter wrote: > >>&g

[Snowdrift-discuss] Let's take care of the blog

2016-05-17 Thread Bryan Richter
Website work is blocked on taking care of the blog, so let's do that. We have to make some decisions, but first we need to agree on what purpose we are trying to achieve. To frame the "purpose" discussion, I'll pose the first question: Where does the blog live? The decision flowchart starts with:

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] modifying donations to feed into the mechanism

2016-05-17 Thread Bryan Richter
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:00:25PM -0600, Peter Harpending wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 03:48:54PM -0400, Stephen Michel wrote: > > To me, it seems like arrears is the clear superior option for MVP. Holding > > funds adds significant legal complexity for what seems like a small benefit > > --

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Let's take care of the blog

2016-05-17 Thread Bryan Richter
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:06:11PM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote: > On 05/17/2016 02:04 PM, Stephen Michel wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Bryan Richter <br...@snowdrift.coop> wrote: > >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:16:09AM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote: > >> >

[Snowdrift-discuss] Keeping content available while moving forward with the main website

2016-05-16 Thread Bryan Richter
I wanted to bring an existing discussion on to the mailing lists to spread the word. Existing discussion: https://tree.taiga.io/project/snowdrift/issue/360 To quote myself there, In order to focus development and drastically reduce maintenance burden, I have deprioritized and removed

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] [Snowdrift-team] modifying donations to feed into the mechanism

2016-05-06 Thread Bryan Richter
[moving to discuss list] On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 12:57:41PM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote: > On 05/06/2016 12:10 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 11:31:52AM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote: > >> > >> > >> In short, I read your comments above as though

[Snowdrift-discuss] git.snowdrift.coop

2016-04-15 Thread Bryan Richter
As most of you know, we don't use Github by default because it isn't FLO software. For the past year or so, we've been piggy-backing on gnu.io's private Gitlab instance, which *is* FLO software. That situation is going away, unfortunately. Luckily, the Gitlab organization has donated to us our

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] How the limit works

2016-08-03 Thread Bryan Richter
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:27:18AM +0200, Robert Martinez (mray) wrote: > > >> On 08/02/2016 06:48 PM, Stephen Michel wrote: > >>> I think the cleanest initial way to go is "No more than $limit will be > >>> added to your outstanding balance each month." That is, carried over > >>> matches

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] How the limit works

2016-08-09 Thread Bryan Richter
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 09:56:30AM -0600, Michael Siepmann wrote: > On 08/09/2016 08:09 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote: > > > On 08/09/2016 06:31 AM, Stephen Michel wrote: > >> On August 9, 2016 8:59:16 AM EDT, Bryan Richter wrote: > >>> > >>> I suggest we sp

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] migrating users

2016-08-15 Thread Bryan Richter
w to allow for the later possibility of adding usernames or additional email addresses. > On 08/12/2016 07:31 AM, Bryan Richter wrote: > > > > There's a really really easy solution to this migration question: > > blow away the entire user table and start over from scratch. &

[Snowdrift-discuss] migrating users

2016-08-12 Thread Bryan Richter
Since persona is shutting down, we have to migrate everyone to an email/passphrase authentication system. I did some analysis of the user table to see what that would require. I found a few different categories of user, which may need different treatments. I broke it down into six different

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] How the limit works

2016-08-10 Thread Bryan Richter
> > On August 9, 2016 4:55:17 PM EDT, Michael Siepmann > wrote: > >I'd add that whether we display a minimum charge or a maximum > >percentage, the fact is that we're using the percentage as our > >guide as to what's a reasonable threshold, so it's more informative >

[Snowdrift-discuss] Design framework meeting -- Wednesday 13 July, 18:00 UTC

2016-07-11 Thread Bryan Richter
A few months ago, we were working on creating a usable framework for Haskellers and non-Haskellers alike to build the front end (html and css) for the website. We're going to re-open that discussion this week. Feel free to join. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Design framework meeting -- Wednesday 13 July, 18:00 UTC

2016-07-13 Thread Bryan Richter
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:40:16PM +0300, Bryan Richter wrote: > A few months ago, we were working on creating a usable framework for > Haskellers and non-Haskellers alike to build the front end (html and > css) for the website. > > We're going to re-open that discussion this

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] How the limit works

2016-08-09 Thread Bryan Richter
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:55:42PM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote: > On 08/03/2016 03:48 PM, Stephen Michel wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote: > >> On 08/03/2016 03:29 PM, Stephen Michel wrote: > >>> Clean slate because context is getting absurd and this

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] How the limit works

2016-08-09 Thread Bryan Richter
On August 9, 2016 10:51:36 PM GMT+03:00, Aaron Wolf <aa...@snowdrift.coop> wrote: >On 08/09/2016 12:37 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote: >> On 08/09/2016 11:20 AM, Bryan Richter wrote: >> >>> >>> There are three things being discussed here, so I want t

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] How the limit works

2016-08-16 Thread Bryan Richter
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 03:03:15PM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote: > On 08/10/2016 01:27 AM, mray wrote: > > > > > > On 09.08.2016 22:43, Aaron Wolf wrote: > >> On 08/09/2016 12:59 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > >> > >>>> Also, I strongly support

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Funding opprtunity?

2017-02-09 Thread Bryan Richter
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:40:24PM +0100, Robert Martinez (mray) wrote: > The FSFE ML just put my attention to a funding project of the german > government: > > https://prototypefund.de/en/ > > It looks like they pay 30.000€ over a 6-month period, given that you > meet some requirements. Imho

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] How the limit works

2016-08-31 Thread Bryan Richter
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:08:54PM -0400, Stephen Michel wrote: > On August 31, 2016 6:38:46 AM EDT, Bryan Richter wrote: > >On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 10:03:38AM -0400, Stephen Michel wrote: > >> On August 20, 2016 8:27:09 AM EDT, mray wrote: > >> >On 16.0

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Using Stripe.js will break LibreJS

2016-09-01 Thread Bryan Richter
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:15:48PM +0300, Bryan Richter wrote: > > I think we need to bend on this one, accept the realities of 2016, and > use stripe.js anyway. We can try to provide advanced warning to > LibreJS/noscript fans if it's truly necessary. Also, it would be quite simple

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Using Stripe.js will break LibreJS

2016-09-05 Thread Bryan Richter
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 01:23:49PM -0500, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: > > Bryan wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 11:18:43PM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote: >>> Update: I checked with Crowd Supply what they do… >>> >>> They say they simply have a form that doesn't use any JS, they >>> process the form

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Using Stripe.js will break LibreJS

2016-09-05 Thread Bryan Richter
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 09:30:19AM +0300, Bryan Richter wrote: > > After thinking about it this weekend, I think I'm comfortable with > putting this on the near-term roadmap. Update: https://tree.taiga.io/project/snowdrift/issue/472 signature.asc Description: Digital

[Snowdrift-discuss] Using Stripe.js will break LibreJS

2016-09-01 Thread Bryan Richter
I found this in their IRC log: https://botbot.me/freenode/stripe/2015-01-27/?msg=30596784=6 Confirmed just now: https://botbot.me/freenode/stripe/2016-09-01/?msg=72325992=5 (Unfortunately I asked my question right as some lunatic was spamming their channel with help requests, heh) If we don't

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] How the limit works

2016-08-31 Thread Bryan Richter
16 22:43, Aaron Wolf wrote: > >>>> On 08/09/2016 12:59 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>> Also, I strongly support displaying it publicly that way "we > >>>>>> only charge if the fee to processor is less than 10%

[Snowdrift-discuss] Now Gitlab has kanban :)

2016-08-31 Thread Bryan Richter
https://about.gitlab.com/2016/08/22/announcing-the-gitlab-issue-board https://git.snowdrift.coop/sd/snowdrift/board I don't have time to have an opinion on this right now. I'll just say that we shouldn't even consider using it yet. We can reconsider in 6–12 months. signature.asc Description:

[Snowdrift-discuss] Status going into 2nd half of September

2016-09-13 Thread Bryan Richter
Hiya, I'm sending this to the whole ML so it will also be a public status update. :) On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:01:20PM +0200, Robert Martinez (mray) wrote: > Since I could not reach you in the last meeting I write you: > > 1. What is the current situation about Sass - are we going to use > it?

[Snowdrift-discuss] Fwd: Taiga release 3.0.0 Stellaria Borealis: An Epic Release

2016-10-03 Thread Bryan Richter
Taiga just had a big upgrade. :) I haven't looked at the new features yet, but they have heirarchies now (!!!), and multiple projects can share user stories and issues. If you haven't looked at Snowdrift's project recently, poke around and see if there's anything we could take better advantage of!

[Snowdrift-discuss] Status and plans for early October

2016-09-25 Thread Bryan Richter
Hi all, Tomorrow I will be in an airplane during the normal meeting time, so here's an email to make up for my absence. I'll list my progress and plans. Last week, I added back all user functionality for pledging to Snowdrift. I put some thought into UX; it should be enough to tide us over until

[Snowdrift-discuss] Meeting notes from today

2016-10-10 Thread Bryan Richter
As some of you know, we have open meetings at least once a week. We've been having them on Mondays at 19:00 UTC out of habit. Everyone is welcome to attend. If that time doesn't work for you, let us know! We should rotate the meeting times to include more people anyway. Here are the notes from

[Snowdrift-discuss] Crowdmatch mechanism ready to merge

2016-11-04 Thread Bryan Richter
https://git.snowdrift.coop/sd/snowdrift/merge_requests/25 STATUS == What this currently does: - Enables configuring payment info - Enables registering/unregistering a pledge. - Tracks a history of pledges and unpledges. What this does not do: - It does not reintegrate the

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Crowdmatch mechanism ready to merge

2016-11-05 Thread Bryan Richter
On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 03:27:23PM -0700, Bryan Richter wrote: > > COMING NEXT > === > > Later today, I will merge this and deploy it to > https://dev.snowdrift.coop. Well, this didn't happen because I was trying to catch up on other things. It will be done Mo

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Appropriate message when login failed

2016-10-18 Thread Bryan Richter
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 03:56:21PM +, Robert Åberg wrote: > Issue: https://tree.taiga.io/project/snowdrift/issue/455 > > ?What would be a good message when the login is failing?. I received a > suggestion about suggesting a password reset. (In case the user just > forgot the password). Any

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Crowdmatch mechanism ready to merge

2016-11-20 Thread Bryan Richter
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 08:26:54PM -0800, Aaron Wolf wrote: > On 11/05/2016 08:19 AM, Bryan Richter wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 03:27:23PM -0700, Bryan Richter wrote: > > > >> > >> COMING NEXT > >> === > >> > > > &

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] How to manage fees for first real-money operations

2016-10-11 Thread Bryan Richter
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 12:58:00PM -0400, Patrick 'P. J.' McDermott wrote: > If you want the amount a project receives to be exactly equal to the > amount a patron intends to donate, here's the math to determine the > extra fee to add. > > Remember that Stripe's fee is 2.9% + $0.30, and begin with

[Snowdrift-discuss] New situation

2016-12-09 Thread Bryan Richter
Hi all, I have taken a full-time job in Portland, so effective immediately I am "just another" Snowdrift volunteer. Yay! Now I can continue to help out the project without being a big, immediate expense for the organization while its cash flow is so miniscule. Of course, my time will be much more

[Snowdrift-discuss] Snowdrift.coop's immediate goals

2016-12-05 Thread Bryan Richter
Now that the reboot of the site is operational, I think it's time to start at the top and work our way down to our next immediate goals. Well, I'll skip ahead a bit, because I think it's obvious: I propose we set a target for Snowdrift's monthly crowdmatch income, and hit it as soon as possible.

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] PCI compliance

2017-07-10 Thread Bryan Richter
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 01:42:34AM +0300, fr33domlover wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:18:53 -0700 Aaron Wolf wrote: > > > The real long-term solution is what CrowdSupply does: They accept > > the financial details on their front-end using only free software > > and then have the server send the

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] git.snowdrift.coop login: Permit GitHub OAuth?

2017-06-29 Thread Bryan Richter
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 01:53:23PM +0200, Robert Martinez (mray) wrote: > > On 06/28/2017 02:04 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > > > >> While poking around the admin panel for git.snowdrift.coop's > >> githost account, I found that I can enable GitHub OAuth.

[Snowdrift-discuss] git.snowdrift.coop login: Permit GitHub OAuth?

2017-06-28 Thread Bryan Richter
While poking around the admin panel for git.snowdrift.coop's githost account, I found that I can enable GitHub OAuth. I've already turned it on as an experiment. Should we leave it on? Pros: - New devs, who probably already have GitHub accounts, can easily create an account on

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] git.snowdrift.coop login: Permit GitHub OAuth?

2017-06-28 Thread Bryan Richter
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 02:36:41PM -0700, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote: > Does GitHub OAuth work with JavaScript disabled? Nope, but I suspect regular ol' logins still work. :) OAuth is just an alternative shown under the password/login form, which hasn't changed. signature.asc Description: Digital

[Snowdrift-discuss] GitHub's new ToS seemed to cause a stir a few months back

2017-07-03 Thread Bryan Richter
I was just looking up git-annex, and came across the following recursively referential articles: - https://joeyh.name/blog/entry/removing_everything_from_github/ - https://www.mirbsd.org/permalinks/wlog-10_e20170301-tg.htm -