Re: [ovs-discuss] Failing ovs tests on big-endian system

On Dec 3, 2014, at 10:32 AM, Jarno Rajahalme jrajaha...@nicira.com wrote: On Dec 2, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 01:30:08PM +0100, Mijo Safradin wrote: It fails on master and on older git versions as well. Even using Debian Sid

Re: [ovs-discuss] Query regarding Bundle Commit and Rollback

On Feb 18, 2015, at 8:06 AM, Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 02:49:12PM +0530, Chethan C R wrote: I am currently investigating on the implementation of OF 1.4 bundles. Per Spec, the implementation should be able to support at least port mod and flow mod in any

Re: [ovs-discuss] "Meter implementation for userspace datapath" upstreamed?

> On Oct 29, 2015, at 9:33 AM, Gray, Mark D wrote: > >>> On Oct 29, 2015, at 4:14 AM, Gray, Mark D wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Was this patch ever upstreamed? It doesn't seem to be in the code base? >>> >>>

Re: [ovs-discuss] RSTP crash in Open vSwitch

> On Oct 12, 2015, at 11:20 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 01:48:21PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: >> >>> On Sep 30, 2015, at 1:54 AM, Daniele Venturino <daniele.ventur...@m3s.it> >>> wrote: >>>

Re: [ovs-discuss] RSTP crash in Open vSwitch

> On Sep 28, 2015, at 9:13 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:31:31AM +, Daniel Swahn wrote: >> (gdb) frame 0 >> #0 0x004291ca in rstp_run (ofproto=, >> ofproto=) at ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c:2278 >> 2278bundle_move(((struct

Re: [ovs-discuss] RSTP crash in Open vSwitch

15-09-30 10:54 > To: Daniel Swahn > Cc: Jarno Rajahalme; Ben Pfaff; b...@openvswitch.org > Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] RSTP crash in Open vSwitch > > I tried the commands you listed but I was not able to reproduce this in a > simpler setup only with RSTP enabled on the bridge.

Re: [ovs-discuss] RSTP crash in Open vSwitch

m not really expecting much from > it, but can you give it a try since I can’t reproduce this? > > Daniele > > <0001-ofproto-dpif-Add-check-in-rstp_run.patch> > Yes, NULLing the aux’es does not help without checking for NULL :-) Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jrajaha...

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] Deletion of Indirect Groups on Ovs2.5

OpenFlow 1.5 spec says: “The group type need not be specified for the delete request.” Jarno > On Mar 17, 2016, at 7:40 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 05:48:23PM +, Shuva Jyoti Kar wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying deletion of an

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS 2.4 and 2.4 Flow deletion issue

again with releases 2.4 and 2.5. Jarno > On Apr 11, 2016, at 5:15 PM, Jarno Rajahalme <ja...@ovn.org> wrote: > > I’m looking into this, > > Jarno > >> On Apr 11, 2016, at 3:41 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: >> >> Jarn

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS 2.4 and 2.4 Flow deletion issue

I’m looking into this, Jarno > On Apr 11, 2016, at 3:41 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > Jarno, it seems likely that this has something to do with the > transactional classifier implementation. Do you think so? Do you have > any idea why deletions would be so slow? > > Thanks, > >

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] Deletion of Indirect Groups on Ovs2.5

> On Mar 20, 2016, at 5:21 PM, Simon Horman <simon.hor...@netronome.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 09:45:08AM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: >> OpenFlow 1.5 spec says: “The group type need not be specified for the delete >> request.” > > Thanks Jarno.

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS 2.4 and 2.4 Flow deletion issue

a mutex for a duration of removing the 1 rules, and due to all the 20 rules having the exactly same metadata match this now takes a long time. Regards, Jarno > Thanks & Regards, > Alok > > -Original Message- > From: Jarno Rajahalme [mailto:ja...@ovn.org] >

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS 2.4 and 2.4 Flow deletion issue

done > > done > date > echo "Flows are added" > > echo "Dump-Flows" > ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-int |wc > date > > end script # > > Thanks & Regards, > Alok > > -Original Message- > From: Jarno Rajahalme [mai

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] ovn: Issue in ACL stage when the dhcp reply packet is resumed

Numan, This seems to be the right fix. In general, recirculations due to NXT_RESUME will fail if the packet metadata is not restored prior to the packet execution. Would you send a patch formatted by git format-patch with your Signed-off-by? Jarno > On May 9, 2016, at 1:55 AM, Numan

Re: [ovs-discuss] OpenFlow 1.3+

> On Oct 12, 2016, at 9:10 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 01:27:46PM +, Andrej Leitner wrote: >> - what does it mean OpenFlow 1.3+ in notes here >> http://openvswitch.org/releases/NEWS-2.6.0? > > OpenFlow 1.3 and later. > >> - there are bundles mentioned

Re: [ovs-discuss] OpenFlow 1.3+

> On Oct 12, 2016, at 2:57 PM, Jarno Rajahalme <ja...@ovn.org> wrote: > >> >> On Oct 12, 2016, at 9:10 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 01:27:46PM +, Andrej Leitner wrote: >>> - what does it mean Open

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] OVS performance with Kernel Datapath of Linux upstream vs Linux OVS tree.

you will be using a recent OVS release rather than an old one. Jarno > On Thu, 13 Apr 2017, 1:05 AM Jarno Rajahalme, <ja...@ovn.org > <mailto:ja...@ovn.org>> wrote: > > > On Apr 12, 2017, at 12:49 AM, Kapil Adhikesavalu <kapil20...@gmail.com > > <mailto:kapil

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] OVS performance with Kernel Datapath of Linux upstream vs Linux OVS tree.

> On Apr 12, 2017, at 12:49 AM, Kapil Adhikesavalu wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there any performance difference with using the OVS kernel Datapath > available part of Linux upstream Vs the module built from Linux OVS tree. > OVS tree kernel module has an Exact Match Cache,