Re: [ACFUG Discuss] ColdFusion 9 Standard to Enterprise Trial

2011-05-05 Thread Ajas Mohammed
ok, in my case it says, Welcome to the ColdFusion Administrator You are using the ColdFusion Developer Edition. This free edition provides the features of ColdFusion Enterprise, but can only be accessed from the local machine and two additional IP addresses. The Developer Edition enables you to le

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] ColdFusion 9 Standard to Enterprise Trial

2011-05-05 Thread Kevin Hellriegel
I apologize for being completely off subject. I did an install on my local machine (windows 7 & apache. no other CF installs) and this is what I see in CF Admin: Welcome to the ColdFusion Administrator ColdFusion Enterprise (Trial) You are using the ColdFusion Developer Edition in Trial Mode. Tr

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] ColdFusion 9 Standard to Enterprise Trial

2011-05-05 Thread Ajas Mohammed
Right, I understand but I think in the past when I have installed trial edition, it says enterprise trial in system information page of CF administrator. But in this case, after installation, I am directly getting developer edition i.e. on first day itself. I dont want that. I guess the point I am

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] ColdFusion 9 Standard to Enterprise Trial

2011-05-05 Thread Frank Moorman
Ajas, I do not think the 2 ip restriction is enforced before the 30 day trial expires. I would expect you to be able to test with the 50 users. (Otherwise, use Kevin's idea...) On 05/05/2011 06:40 PM, Kevin Hellriegel wrote: > I'm not sure if this works, but it's worth a shot to get around the 2

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] ColdFusion 9 Standard to Enterprise Trial

2011-05-05 Thread Kevin Hellriegel
I'm not sure if this works, but it's worth a shot to get around the 2 ip restriction. Try setting up a proxy (something like tcpmon or charles. You could also use the ProxyPass directive in Apache web server) that points to the Developer server and have the 50 users connect to the proxy's port/IP a

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] ColdFusion 9 Standard to Enterprise Trial

2011-05-05 Thread Ajas Mohammed
Thanks Frank. I understand that Developer is trial of Enterprise edition. They want to test out Enterprise for a week or so with 50 plus users. I dont think I can do that because of 2 ip restriction in developer edition. Thats the reason I want a fully functional 30 day Enterprise trial edition on

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] ColdFusion 9 Standard to Enterprise Trial

2011-05-05 Thread Frank Moorman
Ajas, While others are better able to answer this question than myself, I believe that the Developer Edition simply is a trial of the Enterprise edition. One way you can verify that you have the Enterprise edition features is to see if you can access the server monitor in the cfadministrator. This

[ACFUG Discuss] ColdFusion 9 Standard to Enterprise Trial

2011-05-05 Thread Ajas Mohammed
One of our clients wants to try out CF 9 Enterprise 30 day trial. Unfortunately, this server already has CF 9 Standard. So I uninstalled CF 9 Standard (because installer wont give option to install server configuration again) and reinstalled CF 9 server configuration by selecting 30 day trial optio

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] WebService, CF, and Arrays

2011-05-05 Thread Cameron Childress
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Douglas Knudsen wrote: > ha! yeah, my slides are done...under the gun to get my sample code up though > So, yeah, #1 was a typo on my part, but all good there.  #2 would relate to > Remoting It does relate to remoting, just a stab in the dark really. You never kn

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] WebService, CF, and Arrays

2011-05-05 Thread Douglas Knudsen
ha! yeah, my slides are done...under the gun to get my sample code up though So, yeah, #1 was a typo on my part, but all good there. #2 would relate to Remoting, I'm using WebService though, as in WSDL. Yuck, I know, but its demo. Trying to get typed AS objects in Flex land from CF via WebServi

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] WebService, CF, and Arrays

2011-05-05 Thread Cameron Childress
Good to see I'm not the only one still working on a CFO presentation. Two thoughts come to mind. 1) Is the case getAllSTates (capitol T) corrrect? 2) Have you flipped on the serialize-array-to-arraycollection XML flag in services-config? (http://www.rakshith.net/blog/?p=109) I seriously doubt t