Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Another Question From Rip Van Winkle: Oh, they meant ID!

2008-02-18 Thread Peyton Todd
Red-faced, I am now compelled to report that my mistake with getElementById was that the elements reporting this error had no ID, but only a NAME. Duh! Internet Explorer evidently decided to be more forgiving on this point - at least that's my excuse for not noticing it...-Original

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Another Question From Rip Van Winkle: Oh, they meant ID!

2008-02-18 Thread Steven Ross
You gotta love IE's interpretation of coding errors... i hate stuff like that. On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Peyton Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Red-faced, I am now compelled to report that my mistake with getElementById was that the elements reporting this error had no ID, but only a