On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Clint Willard clint...@gmail.com wrote:
Quick glance I'd say listFindNoCase(searchTermList,cgi.http_user_agent).
Put the search terms in a list to find.
This will only work if the entire exact case-less user agent matches an item
in the list. I don't think it
Just to clarify... .htaccess can also redirect and not just block content.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_rewrite.html
It could be used to block or just redirect bad guys to a logging page,
suspected bad guys to a limited site index and all others to your
regular site.
That's
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Mark Fennell fenn...@armc.org wrote:
Just to clarify... .htaccess can also redirect and not just block content.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_rewrite.html
It could be used to block or just redirect bad guys to a logging page,
suspected bad
problem outside of CF,
with some benefit, which is why I pointed to the CF411 list of alternatives.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Clint Willard
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 9:22 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Best way to handle
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.comwrote:
Sure. I'd probably actually use it to ass a URL param badbot=true or
something CF could consume. Again though, may be a lot of wasted energy for
a relatively minor reward.
ADD - to ADD a URL param.
...where's
...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Derrick Peavy
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 5:06 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] Best way to handle chunk of CFIF statements
Looking for a clever solution to this problem.
I have some code on a site that checks
Me and my long emails, I guess. ;-}
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Derrick Peavy
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 11:12 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Best way to handle chunk of CFIF statements
Charlie:
For whatever
_
On Aug 25, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Charlie Arehart wrote:
Me and my “long” emails, I guess. ;-}
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Derrick Peavy
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 11:12 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Best way
[mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Derrick Peavy
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 11:52 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Best way to handle chunk of CFIF statements
Well, don't stop. I prefer content over confusion (short).
__
Derrick Peavy
On Aug 25, 2011
: Charlie Arehart char...@carehart.org
To: discussion@acfug.org
Date: 08/25/2011 01:01 PM
Subject:RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Best way to handle chunk of CFIF
statements
Sent by:ad...@acfug.org
Sadly, you and I are a dying breed, it seems. :-) There’s a definite
subset
@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Best way to handle chunk of CFIF statements
I also favor using as many words as necessary to communicate clearly.
There really is no reason to compromise clarity for brevity's sake. My
keyboard produces just as many words as I need, neither more nor less.
ed
: Charlie Arehart char...@carehart.org
To: discussion@acfug.org
Date: 08/25/2011 01:01 PM
Subject:RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Best way to handle chunk of CFIF
statements
Sent by:ad...@acfug.org
Sadly, you and I are a dying breed, it seems. :-) There’s a definite
01:01 PM
Subject:RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Best way to handle chunk of CFIF
statements
Sent by:ad...@acfug.org
Sadly, you and I are a dying breed, it seems. :-) There’s a definite
subset of the culture who decidedly do NOT like any email longer than a
couple
...@epa.gov | www.ecs-federal.com
From: Charlie Arehart char...@carehart.org
To: discussion@acfug.org
Date: 08/25/2011 01:01 PM
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Best way to handle chunk of CFIF
statements
Sent by: ad...@acfug.org
Sadly, you and I are a dying breed, it seems
[mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Clint Willard
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 1:25 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Best way to handle chunk of CFIF statements
Long as we're off topic..
* No time for long emails
* More than meat of the matter is fat
* I
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Best way to handle chunk of CFIF statements
I was thinking about this... you could create a temp query and use an IN
clause (with a QoQ). Would be a lot cleaner than this...
-
To unsubscribe from this list
Subject:RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Best way to handle chunk of CFIF
statements
Sent by:ad...@acfug.org
Sure, many of us feel that way. Sadly, many do not. That said, I realize
you may mean that I or others still use more words than necessary. One
man's junk is another man's
. :-)
/charlie
-Original Message-
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of
szwedo...@epamail.epa.gov
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 1:38 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Best way to handle chunk of CFIF
statements
I think that you use
Not sure if you are looking for same thing but Ben Nadel had a thread
related to this.
http://www.bennadel.com/blog/1083-ColdFusion-Session-Management-And-Spiders-Bots.htm
Ajas Mohammed /
http://ajashadi.blogspot.com
We cannot become what we need to be, remaining what we are.
No matter what,
19 matches
Mail list logo
