it was designed for self service? maybe it's our
implementation
Dave
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Douglas KnudsenSent: Friday, October 27, 2006
2:33 PMTo: discussion@acfug.orgSubject: Re: [ACFUG
Discuss] Client side
On 10/27/06, Dave
Bel
}
}
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Bellevue
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 2:33 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Client side
We did the whole self-service app push thing with .net with great success.
All we ne
ge-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean H. Saxe
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 1:33 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Client side
My POV is based upon the fact that anyone who receives the code can modify
it to change the data tha
On 10/27/06, Dave Bellevue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because the machines are corporate assets, they are in a controlledenvironment. Formerly, our client machines all had the same corporate imageand all had the .net framework installed and security settings set to allow
client side .net code (deli
Saxe
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 11:51 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Client side
Which still doesn't address the quality of the data...
Why do you need this info from the client? What is the deployment
scenario? Why should any user trust your applet/Active
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean H.
Saxe
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 11:51 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Client side
Which still doesn't address the quality of the data...
Why do you need this info from the
stand your point of view?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean H. Saxe
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 11:51 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Client side
Which still doesn't address the quality of the data.
et the
machine.
Make any sense?
Thanks,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean
H. Saxe
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 11:03 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Client side
You can't trust any client side in
Would something like this be useful?
http://www.belarc.com/free_download.html
mcg
Dave Bellevue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/27/2006 12:03 PM
Please respond to
discussion@acfug.org
To
discussion@acfug.org
cc
Subject
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Clien
L PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean H. Saxe
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 11:03 AM
> To: discussion@acfug.org
> Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Client side
>
> You can't trust any client side information... so why are HTTP headers any
> less reliable than getting
October 27, 2006 11:03 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Client side
You can't trust any client side information... so why are HTTP
headers any
less reliable than getting data from the registry? Also,
what kind of data you get depends on the access level of the user.
I w
Which still doesn't address the quality of the data...
Why do you need this info from the client? What is the deployment
scenario? Why should any user trust your applet/ActiveX control?
Why isn't it spyware?
-dhs
Dean H. Saxe, CISSP, CEH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Free speech exercised both in
s...
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 11:50 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Client side
Signed Java Applet
> I've been away from CF for a while, but am co
inal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean H. Saxe
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 11:03 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Client side
You can't trust any client side information... so why are HTTP headers any
less reliable
Coldfusion would have to be running on the client machine and you'd have to use
cfregistry tag.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Bellevue
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 10:46 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] Client s
Signed Java Applet
> I've been away from CF for a while, but am coming back into MX7
>
> Need to know what is the best (and/or easiest) way run code on the client
> machine - we need to gather information from the registry, find things
> like
> the machine name (http header vars are not reliabl
I'd suggest VBScript?
http://p2p.wrox.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=2759
/m
> I've been away from CF for a while, but am coming back into MX7
Need to know what is the best (and/or easiest) way run code on the client
machine - we need to gather information from the registry, find things like
the
You can't trust any client side information... so why are HTTP
headers any less reliable than getting data from the registry? Also,
what kind of data you get depends on the access level of the user.
I wouldn't let just any code run client side and collect that type of
information, its us
18 matches
Mail list logo
