Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Sun sending Java to Open Source

2006-11-13 Thread Precia
How can Sun profit from such a move? How does this help sales andstock dividends? I'm all for open-source, but I would also like to see the company to stay in business. Precia On 11/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Sun sending Java to Open Source

2006-11-13 Thread Shawn . Gorrell
To discussion@acfug.org cc Subject Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Sun sending Java to Open Source Among other things, it means that when the time comes (relatively soon), Sun will most likely wash their hands clean of-- *SMACK!* (Sorry...) Respectfully, Adam Phillip Churvis Certified

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Sun sending Java to Open Source

2006-11-13 Thread Shawn . Gorrell
PROTECTED] 11/13/2006 10:10 AM Please respond to discussion@acfug.org To discussion@acfug.org cc Subject Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Sun sending Java to Open Source The more open source your product is, the more support is needed because so many more people get their hands

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Sun sending Java to Open Source

2006-11-13 Thread Teddy Payne
@acfug.org Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 8:52 AM Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Sun sending Java to Open Source How can Sun profit from such a move? How does this help sales andstock dividends? I'm all for open-source, but I would also like to see the company to stay in business

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Sun sending Java to Open Source

2006-11-13 Thread John Lyons
@acfug.org *Sent:* Monday, November 13, 2006 8:52 AM *Subject:* Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Sun sending Java to Open Source How can Sun profit from such a move? How does this help sales and stock dividends? I'm all for open-source, but I would also like to see the company to stay

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Sun sending Java to Open Source

2006-11-13 Thread Charlie Arehart
(said in a scratchy old lady voice...) "You're a very naughty boy!" /charlie http://www.carehart.org/blog/ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam ChurvisSent: Monday, November 13, 2006 10:10 AMTo: discussion@acfug.orgSubject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Su

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Sun sending Java to Open Source

2006-11-13 Thread Adam Churvis
for ColdFusion Developers atProductivityEnhancement.com - Original Message - From: Teddy Payne To: discussion@acfug.org Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 10:31 AM Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Sun sending Java to Open Source My apologies. I did not mean to smack Adam

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Sun sending Java to Open Source

2006-11-13 Thread Teddy Payne
# ASP.NET 2.0 for ColdFusion Developers atProductivityEnhancement.com - Original Message - From: Teddy Payne To: discussion@acfug.org Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 10:31 AM Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Sun sending Java to Open Source My apologies. I did not mean

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Sun sending Java to Open Source

2006-11-13 Thread Sterling Ledet
While your prescience was off-base, it's obvious in retrospect that you had actually been a bit confused as to just which product would be next to be open-sourced. You need to increase your doses of melange. (Apologies to the non-Dune fans who won't understand this reference. Java is in my

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Sun sending Java to Open Source

2006-11-13 Thread Teddy Payne
I am by no means the moderator of this list, but I might throw a yellow flag here in the back field.*announcer voice* Unnecessary spearing after the comment was dead. 5 second delay to the offense's line speed. Still first download. Game on.TeddyOn 11/13/06, Sterling Ledet [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Sun sending Java to Open Source

2006-11-13 Thread Vince Bonfanti
: Monday, November 13, 2006 8:52 AMTo: discussion@acfug.orgSubject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Sun sending Java to Open Source How can Sun profit from such a move? How does this help sales andstock dividends? I'm all for open-source, but I would also like to see the company to stay in business