On Wed, 5 Apr 2017, John H. Bennett III wrote:
> So, let's get back to discussing whether this feature needs to be in the
> base, and fully supported going forward.??If so, then agree to provide
> it, and work to get it there.??
Agreed. Followup to the bug tracker (bug 2388)
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, Teo Barian wrote:
> it's easy to end this counter-attack.
Yep - don't feed the trolls. EOT
___
Discussion about project organisation and overall direction
To unsubscribe, e-mail discussion-unsubscr...@lists.contribs.org
Searchable
On Wed, 7 May 2014, John Crisp wrote:
Point made, and taken, but it isn't a solution, particularly in the long
term, and that's what we need
I was merely trying to point out the predicament, and some ideas for
debate.
We can indeed say 'that's a bad idea' but more importantly we
On Mon, 3 Mar 2014, John Crisp wrote:
5.x (Mitel ? approx 2005 ?)
Much earlier - we were at version 5.6 is Jan 2003:
http://osdir.com/ml/network.e-smith.devel/2003-01/msg00129.html
___
Discussion about project organisation and overall direction
To
These posts concern the handover of devinfo from Mitel to contribs.org:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.e-smith.devel/3547
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.e-smith.devel/3546
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.e-smith.devel/3473
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/mitel-networks-acquires-e-smith---accelerating-the-delivery-of-flexible-network-applications-to-small-business-71266742.html
___
Discussion about project organisation and overall direction
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Here is some background for you to peruse to fill out some gaps in your
timeline:
http://joemorrison.org/projects/
http://forums.contribs.org/index.php?topic=40996.msg190584#msg190584
http://lwn.net/2001/0222/a/e-smith-olive.php3
http://lists.contribs.org/pipermail/devinfo/2002-July/003302.html
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013, Greg Zartman wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Charlie Brady
charlieb-contribs-discuss...@budge.apana.org.au wrote:
Here is some background for you to peruse to fill out some gaps in your
timeline:
Man Charlie, you are like a walking archive. :)
Without
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Charlie Brady
charlieb-contribs-discuss...@budge.apana.org.au wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Gordon Rowell gord...@gormand.com.au
wrote:
Has anyone actually owned the community version of e-smith
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Charlie Brady
charlieb-contribs-discuss...@budge.apana.org.au wrote:
Technically true, but in practice it means that non-owners have the
same rights as owners except in rare circumstances. So it makes
ownership
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, John Crisp wrote:
In July 2001, e-smith was acquired by Mitel Networks, in September 2004
by Lycoris, and the project is currently sponsored by Resource
Strategies, Inc. (Not)
I don't know what Lycoris purchased, but it wasn't e-smith or anything
connected with Mitel.
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013, Mike Dawson wrote:
Hi,
Looks to me like there's work to get done, so I'd rather vote in favor
of those who are getting it done, rather than anyone debating the ins
and outs of exactly who/how/under what piece of paper:
+1 for option 3
Another +1.
-Mike
On
Greg, please do not feed the troll. Les Mikesell has no intention of ever
helping to correct any of the deficiencies he sees in this project. He is
highly skilled at suggesting other people do work which he is not
interested in doing himself.
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013, Greg Swallow wrote:
On Thu,
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Charlie Brady
charlieb-contribs-discuss...@budge.apana.org.au wrote:
Greg, please do not feed the troll. Les Mikesell has no intention of ever
helping to correct any of the deficiencies he sees in this project. He
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Shad L. Lords wrote:
Do you have any article or webpage that shows that root can break out of a
mock chroot? If so I'd be interested.
Google is your friend: root can break out of chroot. I don't think that
mock chroot makes any difference.
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Charlie Brady wrote:
What will it take to get Mojolicious::Lite installed on an existing SME8,
and get your example to 'work' pls?
Is there much value in that? AFAIK this example looks exactly the same as
the one currently in SME server.
Looks and works! Actually
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Hsing-Foo Wang wrote:
@all, could you please provide your 1 liner 'support or not' to this
thread? Your short constructive feedback would provide an idea about the
current willingness to add to our efforts.
No, people, please don't flood the list which such posts. If you
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013, John Crisp wrote:
Personally I would love to see contribs developed further but I'm not
sure reinventing the wheel is the right way forward. I guess that I
really wish that Filippo had thrown his resources behind the current
project.
Yes, I wish that too. Failing that,
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013, Charlie Brady wrote:
I don't think there is an urgent need to do anything drastic. I think the
ball is largely in Filippo's court. Do they wish to inject direction,
energy and technological developments into this community, or do they wish
to supplant this community
19 matches
Mail list logo
