On 7/12/21 9:16 PM, marc wrote:
Hi, me again
So I am going to respond to multiple comments in one go:
I had a look at Julia Reda's post, and as far as I can
make out, she only focuses on the fact that individual
snippets are very short - but doesn't make any mention that
inserting *lots*
I think that the point is mainly how much means a copyright issue to train a
machine learning model that can recreate the original with a specific
percentage of similarity bu chunks (and define what means a chunk for code).
As example if GPL license says that you can use the 30% of code lines
On Monday, 12 July 2021 23:16:22 CEST marc wrote:
> Hi, me again
>
> So I am going to respond to multiple comments in one go:
>
> I had a look at Julia Reda's post, and as far as I can
> make out, she only focuses on the fact that individual
> snippets are very short - but doesn't make any
Hi,
you've certainly raised some interesting and important questions, as
well as some deep philosophical comments. Unfortunately they're
(obviously) not all things I can help with; however, some clarifications
might be useful:
* The corpus of software is not part of the copilot "software"
Maybe future versions of GPL could cover this with an extended copyleft
clause. I think it would be justified that software like copilot
(including their datasets) also get GPL'd if they build on top of GPL
source-code.
br. Michael
On 10.07.21 10:58, marc wrote:
Hi
The way I understand
Hi, me again
So I am going to respond to multiple comments in one go:
I had a look at Julia Reda's post, and as far as I can
make out, she only focuses on the fact that individual
snippets are very short - but doesn't make any mention that
inserting *lots* snippets algorithmically is *all* that
Also I experience something similar of CoPilot for the Mozilla Italia
DeepSpeech Italian model
(https://github.com/MozillaItalia/DeepSpeech-Italian-Model).
When I studied how to deal with various audio+text/text-only italian datasets I
talked a bit with other people of the Machine Learning
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 11:12:51 +0200
Paul Schaub wrote:
> Hey,
>
> while I can't answer your questions, here is an article by Julie Reda,
> arguing that Copilot is not in fact infringing copyright and that the
> copyleft movement would not benefit from stricter copyright rules:
>
>
Hey,
while I can't answer your questions, here is an article by Julie Reda,
arguing that Copilot is not in fact infringing copyright and that the
copyleft movement would not benefit from stricter copyright rules:
https://juliareda.eu/2021/07/github-copilot-is-not-infringing-your-copyright/
Hi
The way I understand this (I welcome corrections), is that
copilot is a piece of proprietary software which was built
using a corpus of software hosted on github.
And if I understand it properly, this corpus of software
includes code nominally released under the GPL and similar
licenses. Is
10 matches
Mail list logo
