On Monday, 2019-05-06 17:49:16 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > To: discuss...@lists.fsfellowship.eu, discussion@lists.fsfe.org
> >> [...]
> > Interesting how that mail did not make it to Pocock's list, where every
> > mail now is manually approved.. or discarded..
>
> Given that over 90% of peop
On 06/05/2019 17:01, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday, 2019-05-04 15:41:26 +0200, Diogo Constantino wrote:
>
> To: discuss...@lists.fsfellowship.eu, discussion@lists.fsfe.org
>
>> [...]
>
> Interesting how that mail did not make it to Pocock's list, where every
> mail now is manually
On May 6, 2019 11:49:16 AM EDT, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> the other censors
Aren't you that other person you are talking about in the third person?
___
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@lists.fsfe.org
https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Hi,
On Saturday, 2019-05-04 15:41:26 +0200, Diogo Constantino wrote:
To: discuss...@lists.fsfellowship.eu, discussion@lists.fsfe.org
> [...]
Interesting how that mail did not make it to Pocock's list, where every
mail now is manually approved.. or discarded..
Eike
--
OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypte
Hi,
> On 6. May 2019, at 04:36, Florian Snow wrote:
>
> Calling Daniel's behavior a symptom is a gross understatement.
The symptoms of some ailments can be quite unpleasant, even icky. But I see
your point. Now for some root cause analysis, please.
Cheers,
Mirko.
--
Mirko Boehm | mi...@kde.
Hi Mirko,
Calling Daniel's behavior a symptom is a gross understatement.
Happy hacking!
Florian
___
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@lists.fsfe.org
https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of
Please stop immediatly!
I've certainly not elected you, I'm not even a member of the FSFE or
your abusive fellowship of data robbers, and I certainly haven't
participated on any election.
You have "sequestered" my personal data for the good of your personal
agenda, and hosted it on systems o
Hi Paul,
Thank you for asking this question. Let me try to give you a summary to the
best of my knowledge. I am sorry this mail is going to be pretty long, but I
need to provide some background here for this to make sense.
As far as I can tell the root cause of the issue with Daniel consists
Hello,
> On 4. May 2019, at 02:51, Carmen Bianca Bakker wrote:
>
> Je ven, 2019-05-03 je 23:30 +0200, Paul Schaub skribis:
>> For a start, are the allegations of "censorship" regarding the blog and
>> newsletters written by Daniel Pocock true? I dislike the word
>> censorship, as I can see valid
On Saturday 4. May 2019 02.51.44 Carmen Bianca Bakker wrote:
>
> The gist of it is:
>
> - Elections pit contributors against each other, which is not in the
> spirit of collaboration.
>
> - There are already other ways to become a GA member.
>
> - And, if you ask me, the idea of a "fellowship r
Hi Paul,
Je ven, 2019-05-03 je 23:30 +0200, Paul Schaub skribis:
> For a start, are the allegations of "censorship" regarding the blog and
> newsletters written by Daniel Pocock true? I dislike the word
> censorship, as I can see valid reasons for moderation. Still, is it
> true, that Pococks work
Hello list,
as probably most of us I'm trying to get a clear picture of what
happened and why. On my quest to find answers, and to grasp the
situation as close to truth as possible, I have some questions to
officials of the FSFE.
For a start, are the allegations of "censorship" regarding the blog
12 matches
Mail list logo
