Re: What's so important about the ethics of free software?

2016-12-19 Thread Alessandro Rubini
Charles: > You actually believe that the > user's "rights" exceed mine as the author? I'm willing to bet that there > is at least one other person out there in the FSF(E) community that is > willing to stand-up and publicly challenge that assertion. Anyone? Here. As an individual, not

Re: negative campaigning?

2017-07-30 Thread Alessandro Rubini
> [...] let's consider the advantages of negative campaigning: > + it increases the reach of a message (due to its emotional nature) Or not. In Europe we are "shocked", "outraged", "indignados" every day. We've got enough of that. Negative messages have no effect at all, in my opinion. Then we,

Re: FSFE in Outreachy?

2017-09-05 Thread Alessandro Rubini
Carmen Bianca: >> You are saying that some people deserve >> your sympathy and support, and other people do not deserve your sympathy >> and support, by mere virtue of how they were born. I care for >> _everybody's_ equality and freedom. Surely, I hope, that's a good >> thing. Seconded. Thanks

Re: Public Money Public Code: a good policy for FSFE and other non-profits?

2018-06-14 Thread Alessandro Rubini
Context: Daniel Pocock writes in his own blog that he will repost at the next GA meeting a motion that did not pass at the previous GA meeting. Unchanged, seemingly. Paul Boddie: >>> I was surprised that Daniel's motion to document the FSFE's proprietary >>> dependencies, and to describe ways

to git or not to git

2018-08-27 Thread Alessandro Rubini
This is the question. Or, better, to github or not to github. Once upon a time, github was a bad hosting site, because the site code is not free, and we should have rather preferred gitorious. I did. But then gitorious closed shop and I had to go to the various projects (hosted elsewhere) that

Re: to git or not to git

2018-09-05 Thread Alessandro Rubini
> Using Mercurial instead of git is also a bit like using another kernel > instead of Linux. It seems unnecessary to use something else when you already > have something that works, but it's useful to have working options in case > you find yourself using a device without a Linux port but with

Re: to git or not to git

2018-08-31 Thread Alessandro Rubini
Thanks to all who replied. Let me comment a little on these recomendations, suggested by Bastien: >>https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html >>https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria.en.html To which Bernhard (and Sandro) noted: > Not taking new developments into

Re: recommendations for a mini laptop

2019-07-05 Thread Alessandro Rubini
> On the german list someone came up with the eeePC. This is from size exactly > what I am looking for and you can get them second hand at around 50 euro. I had 3. One was my laptop (with external keyboard), one was my son's and the other was my wife's desktop (with external kbd/mouse. One broke

Re: FSFE-defined coding standards?

2021-02-10 Thread Alessandro Rubini
Hello. I don't think FSFE should provide coding standard: everybody is already doing that. Some coding standard make no sense, some are ugly, some are good; you only need to choose yours -- or be forced by your employer. The problem your describe is that of bashisms. I agree we should use

Re: Criticisms and choices

2022-03-21 Thread Alessandro Rubini
Paul Boddie: >> [...] Bernhard Reiter > [...] > Hope it is helpful to see why most of your writings do not convince > me and they are often not specific enough to be able to answer them > without a lot of time and research. On the other hand, I find Paul's posts always enlighting. I do not

Re: banking and Free Software

2024-02-27 Thread Alessandro Rubini
> I'm curious to hear what you think about this topic. In my opinion it is a serious problem. Not only about banks: everybody and everything is willing to install trojan horses in our telephones. And the telephone is becoming a bad SPoF -- but most users don't care because everything is backed-up