Re: selective censorship (aka some words from your list-admins)
Dear Daniel, On 05.09.2018 20:25, Daniel Pocock wrote: > One of those posts is so offensive and inaccurate that I would kindly > request that if you are willing to censor new subscribers, Moderation is unlike censorship. Every message that is written in an appropriate tone will be delivered to the list, no matter the opinion. > you also > censor that GA member by removing his post from the public archive. removing posts from the archive is not possible (for me). > I would also request that you escalate that particular post to the CARE > team. When anyone feels attacked on a FSFE list in a way that is against our Code of Conduct, please contact the CARE team about it directly yourself. You do not need me or anyone else for this process in between. You can find contact information of the team and its individuals here: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct#CARE Best regards, Erik -- No one shall ever be forced to use non-free software Erik Albers | Communication & Community Coordinator | FSFE OpenPGP Key-ID: 0x8639DC81 on keys.gnupg.net ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct
Re: selective censorship (aka some words from your list-admins)
And for once l quote you totally. It is ridiculous and shameful behaviour of this individual. Outrageous. They all should resign unanimously because l see no one stopping this madness from inside. On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, 19:25 Daniel Pocock, wrote: > > > On 05/09/18 16:49, Erik Albers wrote: > > > The list administration would like to help bring back a good tone and > > discussion culture by moderating the discussion if necessary and for now > we > > set new subscriptions to the list on moderation. > > > > The most offensive accusations made on the list today were not from new > subscribers, they appear to be made by a GA member from Germany, in fact > former country coordinator for Germany. Out of your respect for your > request for being friendly, I'll avoid repeating his name again. > > One of those posts is so offensive and inaccurate that I would kindly > request that if you are willing to censor new subscribers, you also > censor that GA member by removing his post from the public archive. > > I would also request that you escalate that particular post to the CARE > team. > > The root cause of all this appears to be the executive's decision to > attack the fellowship representative with an ultimately unsuccessful > motion to prematurely terminate his membership of FSFE e.V. I remain of > the opinion that the resignation of the president may be more effective > in helping the community move on from that than tweaking moderation > settings. > > Regards, > > Daniel > > FSFE Fellowship Representative > ___ > Discussion mailing list > Discussion@lists.fsfe.org > https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion > > This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All > participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: > https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct > ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct
Re: selective censorship (aka some words from your list-admins)
On 05/09/18 16:49, Erik Albers wrote: > The list administration would like to help bring back a good tone and > discussion culture by moderating the discussion if necessary and for now we > set new subscriptions to the list on moderation. > The most offensive accusations made on the list today were not from new subscribers, they appear to be made by a GA member from Germany, in fact former country coordinator for Germany. Out of your respect for your request for being friendly, I'll avoid repeating his name again. One of those posts is so offensive and inaccurate that I would kindly request that if you are willing to censor new subscribers, you also censor that GA member by removing his post from the public archive. I would also request that you escalate that particular post to the CARE team. The root cause of all this appears to be the executive's decision to attack the fellowship representative with an ultimately unsuccessful motion to prematurely terminate his membership of FSFE e.V. I remain of the opinion that the resignation of the president may be more effective in helping the community move on from that than tweaking moderation settings. Regards, Daniel FSFE Fellowship Representative ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct
