Re: best way to support Free Software financially?

On 02/10/2019 11:04, John Rooke wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > thanks for your response. > > On 30/09/2019 10:44, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> I agree that was a very simplistic example, it was intended to get >> people thinking about the case of donating to not profits so please >> don't become too

Re: best way to support Free Software financially?

Hi Daniel, thanks for your response. On 30/09/2019 10:44, Daniel Pocock wrote: I agree that was a very simplistic example, it was intended to get people thinking about the case of donating to not profits so please don't become too stressed about

Re: best way to support Free Software financially?

On 29/09/2019 10:11, John Rooke wrote: > Daniel, > > Just a comment on your market model > > On 29/09/2019 00:23, Daniel Pocock wrote >> Imagine you need a surgery. Will you choose: >> >> a) the doctor with the lowest number of dead patients? >> b) the doctor with the lowest price? >> c) the

Re: consent to be deceived? (was: Re: best way to support Free Software financially?)

Daniel, clearly there are many people here demanding to be removed from this list. And when I receive two emails from Adrienne about #RiseUp, etc. via FSF and FSFE, it’s clear that this list is a *new* list you’ve subscribed me to *without my consent.* It’s pretty embarrassing to see your

Re: consent to be deceived? (was: Re: best way to support Free Software financially?)

On September 29, 2019 9:42:25 AM GMT+02:00, Daniel Pocock wrote: >This is the same list with a new name, No, it is a new list with a similar name (in order to confuse and deceive) and you subscribed everyone without their consent. >Censorship on the FSFE-operated list is a form >of

Re: best way to support Free Software financially?

Daniel, Just a comment on your market model On 29/09/2019 00:23, Daniel Pocock wrote Imagine you need a surgery. Will you choose: a) the doctor with the lowest number of dead patients? b) the doctor with the lowest price? c) the doctor who makes you

Re: consent to be deceived? (was: Re: best way to support Free Software financially?)

On 29/09/2019 10:03, Danny Spitzberg wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 12:42 AM Daniel Pocock > wrote: > > > > On 29/09/2019 02:07, Danny Spitzberg wrote: > > I did not subscribe nor consent to be subscribed to this list > > > > This is the

Re: consent to be deceived? (was: Re: best way to support Free Software financially?)

On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 12:42 AM Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 29/09/2019 02:07, Danny Spitzberg wrote: > > I did not subscribe nor consent to be subscribed to this list > > > > This is the same list with a new name, discussing the same topic, how we > can support free software No, it is not;

consent to be deceived? (was: Re: best way to support Free Software financially?)

On 29/09/2019 02:07, Danny Spitzberg wrote: > I did not subscribe nor consent to be subscribed to this list > This is the same list with a new name, discussing the same topic, how we can support free software Censorship on the FSFE-operated list is a form of deception, it hides the views of

Re: best way to support Free Software financially?

I did not subscribe nor consent to be subscribed to this list Daniel, please remove me, and please consider removing everyone else who is in the same situation On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 4:24 PM Daniel Pocock wrote: > > Many people in FSF and FSFE have been reflecting on whether to donate > again

best way to support Free Software financially?

Many people in FSF and FSFE have been reflecting on whether to donate again given the current problems in each organization. It is disturbing for me that I have now had quite a few discussions with people who donated to these groups in the past, stopped donating and then completely abandoned