Not sure why, but this seems to be a very popular feature request
these days, I can count at least 3 different requests for this in the
last week. No need to file a feature request for this feature unless
the code that comes out of the hackathon doesn't do what you want (not
directed at you Chris
On 7/27/05, Randy B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> I'm not certain I understand what you're talking about - the only
> load-balancing I can find described for CARP (net.inet.carp.arpbalance)
> only does incoming load-balancing at L2; that's according to the latest
> OpenBSD carp(4) man page I can
Chris Buechler wrote:
CARP does L3. At this point it doesn't detect dead hosts so a
percentage of your requests will fail if one of the boxes dies, but
that's being worked on.
I'm not certain I understand what you're talking about - the only
load-balancing I can find described for CARP (net.in
On 7/27/05, Craig FALCONER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't comment on the load balancing, but pfsense will not be damaged by a
> random powerout unless you're in the process of saving a config change right
> then. If the power is out, you won't be reconfiguring your router :)
>
> That may no
On 7/27/05, Matthew Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Lenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "pfsense"
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 3:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] multipe ips on the wan interface?
>
>
> > I should have said
> >
> > 1. add v
I have 4 subnet's that each have their own interfaces (LAN, OPT1, OPT2,
OPT3) and are the gateway for each of the subnets. I have development and
backend t1 access on the LAN net, webservers on the opt1 net, app and
database servers on opt2 and the mail servers are on opt3.
I intend to make it so
I can't comment on the load balancing, but pfsense will not be damaged by a
random powerout unless you're in the process of saving a config change right
then. If the power is out, you won't be reconfiguring your router :)
That may not hold for packages like squid... Though the worst that could
ha
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Lenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pfsense"
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] multipe ips on the wan interface?
> I should have said
>
> 1. add virtual ip (am I supposed to beable to select the cidr? it greys
out
> a
Bill Marquette said on Thursday, 28 July 2005 at 8:14 a.m:
> > and forwarded port 80 to the private ip of my server's port 80.
>
> Port forwarding?
>
The alternative is to perform 1:1 NAT and add an accept rule to the
firewall for port 80, with the default being to block all. That is,
unless pf
I should have said
1. add virtual ip (am I supposed to beable to select the cidr? it greys out
and is set to /32)
2. add NAT: Port Forwarding entry using WAN, the virtual ip in step 1, tcp,
from 80, my servers private ip, local port 80, checked auto add firewall
rule.
3. reverified that virtual ip
On 7/27/05, Matthew Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> say I want to have multiple ip's on the wan interface so that I can forward
> http/https for one public ip to a private ip behind the firewall and
> smtp/imap on a different public ip to a another private ip behind the
> firewall. I thought thi
say I want to have multiple ip's on the wan interface so that I can forward
http/https for one public ip to a private ip behind the firewall and
smtp/imap on a different public ip to a another private ip behind the
firewall. I thought this was what the virtual ip functionality is for.
I added a v
On 7/27/05, Randy B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That said, I'd love to see a couple of bits of functionality added, but
> am really not sure how to go about it. The first is an L3 load
> balancer,
CARP does L3. At this point it doesn't detect dead hosts so a
percentage of your requests will
I really enjoy pfSense; it's an incredible project, and as I learn more
about using/administering *BSD systems, I hope to be able to contribute
more than my opinion. ;-)
That said, I'd love to see a couple of bits of functionality added, but
am really not sure how to go about it. The first i
14 matches
Mail list logo
