Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
At 04:33 PM 11/1/2005, you wrote:
Count me in on SNAT/DNAT. It has been used for a long time and I for one
think it's very descriptive and logical.
Seconded.
How is that better than a circuit level gateway? I lean towards that
sort of thing since it reduces
from the release notes for FreeBSD 6.0
cdboot now works around a BIOS problem observed on some systems when
booting from USB CDROM drives.
swet. This was kicking my butt when I first started using pfSense.
I was really hesitant about upgrading my FWs because if they got horked
really bad
Give it a try... http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/pfSense-LiveCD-0.92.iso
Scott
On 11/4/05, Matthew Lenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
from the release notes for FreeBSD 6.0
cdboot now works around a BIOS problem observed on some systems when
booting from USB CDROM drives.
swet. This was
http://www.loganalysis.org/
For all your log analysis needs.
--
http://www.lightconsulting.com/~travis/ --
We already have enough fast, insecure systems. -- Schneier Ferguson
GPG fingerprint: 50A1 15C5 A9DE 23B9 ED98 C93E 38E9 204A 94C2 641B
