Re: [pfSense-discussion] optimal way for a colo setup

2009-12-14 Thread Espen Johansen
I guess he means this one: http://www.supermicro.com/products/chassis/1U/515/SC515-280U.cfm -lsf On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 11:28:46PM +1100, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: What you describe is exactly what we are in the process of

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Problem with FW states

2006-12-18 Thread Espen Johansen
You can try to set Firewall optimization options in the Advanced page to aggressive and see if that helps. -lsf On 12/15/06, Odette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm not able to find a solution to this problem: I've got some devices on the WAN net that need to open telnet connections to a

RE: [pfSense-discussion] hw sizing

2005-12-17 Thread Espen Johansen
Take a look at www.nexcom.com they have several nice boxes. The xeons can perform close to Gigabit thruput. -lsf -Original Message- From: Jure Pecar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16. desember 2005 16:38 To: discussion@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense-discussion] hw sizing Hi

RE: [pfSense-discussion] Unfork m0n0wall

2005-11-27 Thread Espen Johansen
I think you need to read thru the code. What is pfsense/monowall ? In simple terms it's freebsd 6.x and freebsd 4.x with a web gui and some minor patches. Each creates a bunch of firewall rules for either ipfilter (m0n0) or pf (pfsense). The OS is more or less a stock freebsd with a bunch of stuff

RE: [pfSense-discussion] how do I not rdr with pfsense

2005-11-01 Thread Espen Johansen
Count me in on SNAT/DNAT. It has been used for a long time and I for one think it's very descriptive and logical. -lsf -Original Message- From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 1. november 2005 15:13 To: discussion@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] how do I not