Re: [pfSense-discussion] IPSEC tunnel, external address

2005-10-25 Thread Jan Ślusarczyk
The real goal of this setup is to connect inside computer with private address 192.168.6.190 (nated 1:1 to 212.75.96.190) to remote servers 212.2.96.67 and 212.2.96.80. This is only possible through IPSec tunnel with remote gateway 212.2.102.235. My pfSense is configured with 212.75.96.186

[pfSense-discussion] IPSEC tunnel, external address

2005-10-24 Thread Jan Ślusarczyk
Is it possible to tunnel an outside IP through the IPSec on pfSense? I've had the following configuration on my PIX: Remote side: Tunnel target was public address X.X.2.67 Tunnel gateway was public address X.X.102.135 Local side: Tunnel gateway (Cisco PIX): Public address Y.Y.75.186 Tunnel targ

RE: [pfSense-discussion] Virtual IPs, NAT 1:1 - I need help

2005-10-16 Thread Jan Ślusarczyk
Hi Thank you for your reply. I am using Proxy ARP in Virtual IPs. > > . I have added 192.168.1.55 -> 192.168.6.55 1:1 NAT and firewall > > rules to allow ICMP and port 80 to 192.168.1.55. No reply from ping to > > 192.168.1.55. > > Did you setup a rule to allow ICMP through to 192.168.6.

[pfSense-discussion] Virtual IPs, NAT 1:1 - I need help

2005-10-16 Thread Jan Ślusarczyk
Hi The short background. My Cisco Pix has died last Thursday. We suspect a hardware problem with Flash memory but before we will be able to run it again we have to use a temporary solution to protect our collocated servers. The network. We have two physical servers