your lan ip is in the same subnet as your wan ip. change the lan to
192.168.2.x/24
sai
On 5/25/08, John Dakos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello lovely FreeBSD Pfsense
i have a problem with uploading files. i cannot upload files to
everything yahoo.com , hotmail.com and nothing else. my
Realtek and Via ethernet interfaces are supported and are used by many
on this list, but the hadware and the drivers are not as good as the
Intel ethernet.
sai
On 10/25/07, Adam Van Ornum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been looking into a Via C7 based system to run pfSense on and so far
all
#openssl engine
will tell you if your machine is running padlock or not
sai
On 4/26/07, Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=padlocksektion=4manpath=FreeBSD+6.2-RELEASE
already in http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1_2/
?
I'm particular
when putting in the firewall.
A network diagram of what you are proposing would be much easier to
understand - fewer misunderstandings.
sai
to block
urls.
3) VPN from WAN to our companys windows server within de desktops network.
You can VPN to the whole LAN.
sai
you can only have one ping working per subnet at a time. So if you
have left your pings running they will interfere with each other. ICMP
does not NAT too well.
sai
On 11/1/06, Sam Newnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I'm being dumb or its just been a long day but I'm having a slight
the checking?
sai
On 10/16/06, DarkFoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody.
A friend of mine recently informed me that his college is going to be adding
some policy enforcement devices (Cisco brand) to their network that will
push Symantec Security software onto all computers on the campus
)
Max throughput is easily benched using Iperf.
Greg
iperf is good for me too. can use different packet sizes, large number
of clients.
sai
that ease of development is more important at this stage
than ease of use.
sai
Chris wrote:
http://m0n0.ch/wall/list-dev/?action=show_msgactionargs%5B%5D=12actionargs%5B%5D=81
__Shaping__
The shaping is a big deal. It's a combination of a GUI issue and
limitations in pf. You have to apply
personally I prefer to allow specific ports - eg SMTP, POP, HTTP, HTTPS
this allows fewes holes and so is more secure than allowing 1-1.
sai
On 10/31/05, dny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi.
i want to setup wifi interface to allow user to use only the internet.
i like to setup a firewall
have been trying to figure out how the shaper works but its not happening
:-(
When I add a rule I get 2 target queues. Being used to mono I was
expecting just one and do not understand this at all. Why are there 2?
What do they mean?
sai
a
single point of failure with increased possibiliites of failure
because you have so much going on.
sai
C seems too unsafe a language to me in which to write security applications.
its not the language, its the programmer.
I'm sure there are people who write unsafe code in Python.
sai
On 9/22/05, Travis H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well it's not set in stone.
C seems too unsafe a language
use lynx ?
:-)
On 8/31/05, Kim C. Callis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a device that can only do command line... Where can I find how to do
the following:
Reduce LAN bandwidth
Stop LAN communications
and of course be able to start it back up or return back to defaults? The
same is
14 matches
Mail list logo
