[pfSense-discussion] 2.0-BETA5 (i386) built on Sat Jan 1 17:53:01 EST 2011

2011-01-02 Thread Eugen Leitl
I'm screwed up after yesterday's update. The firewall stopped routing after yesterday's upgrade to 2.0-BETA5 built on Sat Jan 1 17:53:01 EST 2011 The firewall seems to see everthing (with the exception of package updates: Unable to communicate with www.pfsense.com. Please verify DNS and

Re: [pfSense-discussion] 2.0-BETA5 (i386) built on Sat Jan 1 17:53:01 EST 2011

2011-01-02 Thread Alexander Lesle
Guten Tag Eugen Leitl, I found on the snapshot server two betas one for x86 and one amd64. BETA4 for 27.Dec. Tell me what you need. am Sonntag, 2. Januar 2011 um 11:00 hat Eugen Leitl u.a. in mid:20110102100015.gt16...@leitl.org geschrieben: As I can't browse the web, can someone toss me an

Re: [pfSense-discussion] 2.0-BETA5 (i386) built on Sat Jan 1 17:53:01 EST 2011

2011-01-02 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 12:23:13PM +0100, Alexander Lesle wrote: Guten Tag Eugen Leitl, Thanks Alexander. I've put up my backup ALIX meanwhile, which I keep around for such just purposes. I'll try to download the latest snapshot .iso, and reinstall from scratch. Resetting to factory defaults is

Re: [pfSense-discussion] 2.0-BETA5 (i386) built on Sat Jan 1 17:53:01 EST 2011

2011-01-02 Thread Jim Pingle
On 1/2/2011 5:00 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: I'm screwed up after yesterday's update. The firewall stopped routing after yesterday's upgrade to 2.0-BETA5 built on Sat Jan 1 17:53:01 EST 2011 The firewall seems to see everthing (with the exception of package updates: Unable to communicate

Re: [pfSense-discussion] 2.0-BETA5 (i386) built on Sat Jan 1 17:53:01 EST 2011

2011-01-02 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 10:06:54AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote: Actually it looks like the packages aren't loading on pfSense.com, which would cause that error. It probably isn't related to the snapshots except that it may be trying (and failing) to reinstall packages after the upgrade. FWIF,

Re: [pfSense-discussion] 2.0-BETA5 (i386) built on Sat Jan 1 17:53:01 EST 2011

2011-01-02 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 10:36:42AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote: If there is, it's probably related to the packages you had installed... I agree it's probably the packages. I've noticed it before, so usually I purge the packages before upgrade. Got lazy this time. I think I'll purge the packages

Re: [pfSense-discussion] 2.0-BETA5 (i386) built on Sat Jan 1 17:53:01 EST 2011

2011-01-02 Thread Jim Pingle
On 1/2/2011 10:45 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 10:36:42AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote: If there is, it's probably related to the packages you had installed... I agree it's probably the packages. I've noticed it before, so usually I purge the packages before upgrade. Got lazy

Re: [pfSense-discussion] 2.0-BETA5 (i386) built on Sat Jan 1 17:53:01 EST 2011

2011-01-02 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 11:44:07AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote: The packages should be OK again now. See the packages, upgrade of the other systems (from a snapshot of 15 days ago) was uneventful (I purged whatever few packages I had). Is carp+pfsync cluster failover working on the 1. Jan snapshot

Re: [pfSense-discussion] 2.0-BETA5 (i386) built on Sat Jan 1 17:53:01 EST 2011

2011-01-02 Thread Jim Pingle
On 1/2/2011 12:35 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote: On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 11:44:07AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote: The packages should be OK again now. See the packages, upgrade of the other systems (from a snapshot of 15 days ago) was uneventful (I purged whatever few packages I had). Is