On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 5:17 AM, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I presume this is the same problem as
> http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=11531.msg63655
>
That person bought a support contract and we helped him resolve that,
his firewall rules weren't setup properly to allow the
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 05:26:58PM -0400, Chris Buechler wrote:
> Now I'm just as confused. :) You mentioned "the problem is that
> LAN was on a different subnet. Put them on the same network
> (different from WAN)" - what does "them" refer to then?
I presume this is the same problem as
http:/
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 05:13:27PM -0400, Chris Buechler wrote:
>
>> LAN was on a different subnet from what?
>
> LAN was a different subnet from WAN (in transparent bridge
> this shouldn't matter, and it doesn't, with the exc
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 05:13:27PM -0400, Chris Buechler wrote:
> LAN was on a different subnet from what?
LAN was a different subnet from WAN (in transparent bridge
this shouldn't matter, and it doesn't, with the exception of DNS).
Strangely enough, I now notice that both firewalls are
active,
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a pair of pfsense 1.2.1-RC1 working in a poor man's
> failover (a parallel pair of transparent bridges).
>
> Had a problem with DNS lookup blockage, the problem is that
> LAN was on a different subnet. Put them on the
I have a pair of pfsense 1.2.1-RC1 working in a poor man's
failover (a parallel pair of transparent bridges).
Had a problem with DNS lookup blockage, the problem is that
LAN was on a different subnet. Put them on the same network
(different from WAN) and things work now. Failover is some 20-30 se
