Re: [pfSense-discussion] second WAN on DHCP

2011-01-11 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:05:30AM -0500, David Wadson wrote: > > How do you solve this? > > > Create a gateway load balancer with just that WAN connection in it. Then you > can use LAN rules to direct traffic to it by IP address or traffic type. Thanks everybody. It looks simpler than I thoug

Re: [pfSense-discussion] second WAN on DHCP

2011-01-11 Thread David Wadson
On Jan 11, 2011, at 8:45 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: > > We're about to add a second WAN (6/100 MBit/s > DOCSIS 3.0 cable modem with DHCP) to our pfsense > 1.2.3, soon 2.0 (current WAN is 100 MBit/s optical > Ethernet, with about 150 GByte/month included, > overtraffic expensive). > > The obvious

Re: [pfSense-discussion] second WAN on DHCP

2011-01-11 Thread ey
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 08:59:27AM -0500, e...@tm-k.com wrote: > >> You can configure it by host IP (range) and/or by traffic type. >> Different > > Host IP as in LAN or Internet host, or both? Either or both. > >> gateway is not very neat solution and to be honest I do not know how >> would >>

Re: [pfSense-discussion] second WAN on DHCP

2011-01-11 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 08:59:27AM -0500, e...@tm-k.com wrote: > You can configure it by host IP (range) and/or by traffic type. Different Host IP as in LAN or Internet host, or both? > gateway is not very neat solution and to be honest I do not know how would > you configure that. Yeah, that w

Re: [pfSense-discussion] second WAN on DHCP

2011-01-11 Thread ey
> > We're about to add a second WAN (6/100 MBit/s > DOCSIS 3.0 cable modem with DHCP) to our pfsense > 1.2.3, soon 2.0 (current WAN is 100 MBit/s optical > Ethernet, with about 150 GByte/month included, > overtraffic expensive). > > The obvious use for the second WAN would be bulk > downloads. How

[pfSense-discussion] second WAN on DHCP

2011-01-11 Thread Eugen Leitl
We're about to add a second WAN (6/100 MBit/s DOCSIS 3.0 cable modem with DHCP) to our pfsense 1.2.3, soon 2.0 (current WAN is 100 MBit/s optical Ethernet, with about 150 GByte/month included, overtraffic expensive). The obvious use for the second WAN would be bulk downloads. How would one wan