Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

2008-03-07 Thread David Rees
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Ryan Neily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyhow, it's fixed now. You can go on complaining about something else... Since you asked, please stop sending HTML emails to the list and use plain text, it makes things so much more readable in most MUAs and in the mail

Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

2008-03-07 Thread Jan Hoevers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 6-3-2008 7:43: A, now I see :-) Thanks /Claus/ hi Claus, FYI, the NTP pool introduced a geolocation DNS system a few months ago, mainly because of load distribution problems in the european pool zones. This explains why you see nearby servers, even when using

Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

2008-03-06 Thread Greg Hennessy
|Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service | | |On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:00 PM, jason whitt |[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | i may be wrong here however i thought there was a default |time server sync | setup in the config? | |There is. Look in System-General. Bottom of the page I believe

Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

2008-03-06 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 01:32:11PM +, Paul M wrote: I too have asked him privately. I suspect he's using Lotus Notes or something equally horrible which cannot be configured sanely! That's what God invented webmail for. Can the list admin get the mail system changed to strip the

Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

2008-03-06 Thread RB
The correct course of action is to boot him off on first offense. This makes seven on my count

Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

2008-03-06 Thread Paul M
RB wrote: No, really - I asked you once in private, now I ask you again in I too have asked him privately. I suspect he's using Lotus Notes or something equally horrible which cannot be configured sanely! Can the list admin get the mail system changed to strip the recipient request headers out?

RE: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

2008-03-06 Thread Ryan Neily
Return Receipt Your RE: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service document

Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

2008-03-06 Thread RB
Bwa ha ha! Delicious, delicious irony! I knew it was inevitable since Ryan had to read the thread at least once more before fixing things, but it was worth it to see this one come in. On 3/6/08, Ryan Neily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Return Receipt Your document: RE: [pfSense-discussion

Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

2008-03-06 Thread Ryan Neily
| --| | | Subject: | | --| |Re: [pfSense-discussion

Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

2008-03-06 Thread Eugen Leitl
his spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] with full headers. If anyone on this list would start doing it, maybe his admins would wise up, and LART him. On 3/6/08, Ryan Neily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Return Receipt Your document: RE: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time

Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

2008-03-06 Thread Ryan Neily
Return Receipt Your Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service document

Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

2008-03-06 Thread Paul M
Eugen Leitl wrote: On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 02:53:19PM +, Paul M wrote: RB wrote: Bwa ha ha! Delicious, delicious irony! I knew it was inevitable since Ryan had to read the thread at least once more before fixing things, but it was worth it to see this one come in. has he fixed things?

Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

2008-03-06 Thread Ryan Neily
: | | --| |Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

2008-03-06 Thread RB
The real problem is that the %^$%^#$ mail program I am using does not allow you to turn of return receipts. Corporate standards for the win! I feel for you, as your situation is very similar to what initially drove me to use my own address versus a corporate one. Anyhow, it's fixed now.

Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

2008-03-05 Thread jason whitt
i may be wrong here however i thought there was a default time server sync setup in the config? On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I noticed that pfSense makes frequent connections to time servers (udp123) but eventhough I didn't configure anything

Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

2008-03-05 Thread Bill Marquette
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:00 PM, jason whitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i may be wrong here however i thought there was a default time server sync setup in the config? There is. Look in System-General. Bottom of the page I believe. --Bill

RE: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

2008-03-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Posted At: Thursday, March 06, 2008 1:55 AM |Posted To: pfSense |Conversation: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service |Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service | | |On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:00 PM, jason whitt |[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | i may be wrong here

RE: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

2008-03-05 Thread Ryan Neily
Return Receipt Your RE: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service document

RE: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service

2008-03-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service Hey, You probably are seeing a few ADSL subscribers. 0.pfsense.pool.ntp.org is a distributed cluster (a pool of servers), not just one server. Check out http://www.pool.ntp.org/ for more info. Cheers, Jason Hensler