Re: [pfSense-discussion] centralized management with distributed pfsense installations

2008-12-22 Thread Paul Mansfield
Jason Dixon wrote:
 This is something I've been thinking about quite a bit lately.  I'd like
 to see something modular that could potentially be used on any PF-based
 system.  If there are others interested in this (or already working on
 it), please contact me.


I nice feature I'd like would be to make the configuration selectively
exportable/importable, in particular the aliases, so that it'd be easier
to keep things consistent.

It'd then be possible to expand the feature into having a master pfsense
node selectively push configuration sections to slaves.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: discussion-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



[pfSense-discussion] atom + US15W pico ITX board

2008-12-22 Thread Paul Mansfield

we've been a close observer of low-power CPUs and chipsets, because a
lot of our costs are colocation fees which are mainly about power.

In theory Pouslbo/US15W is much more efficient than the usual atom +
desktop chipset, but it not particularly common... then I came across this:

http://www.igologic.com/products/Product.aspx?ProductID=78


is anyone else considering these type of devices?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: discussion-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense-discussion] atom + US15W pico ITX board

2008-12-22 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 05:26:24PM +, Paul Mansfield wrote:
 
 we've been a close observer of low-power CPUs and chipsets, because a
 lot of our costs are colocation fees which are mainly about power.
 
 In theory Pouslbo/US15W is much more efficient than the usual atom +
 desktop chipset, but it not particularly common... then I came across this:
 
 http://www.igologic.com/products/Product.aspx?ProductID=78
 
 
 is anyone else considering these type of devices?

I presume you're talking firewall, have you considered
VIA Nano? The performance is slightly on top of Atom,
and Atom doesn't have the RNG and the crypto built-in.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: discussion-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org