[pfSense-discussion] Certificates with pfsense IPSEC

2006-02-28 Thread Dave C. Arthur
Hello Again, I would like to subscribe the help of someone who is familiar with the creation of IPSEC VPN tunnels, using certificates. We have successfully used pfsense with shared secrets and we now want to test the use of certificates as an authentication source. I have had my

Re: [pfSense-discussion] licience of php interface ?

2006-02-28 Thread Bill Marquette
On 2/28/06, Adam Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just to be sure we are on the same page. I am referring to static port mappings. Not static IP NAT mappings. I am pretty sure most firewalling filters can do static IP mappings through NAT (1 to 1, etc). Basically just making sure that the

Re: [pfSense-discussion] licience of php interface ?

2006-02-28 Thread Adam Gibson
Bill Marquette wrote: Opinions aside. My intent was to get access to his code because for my purposes I would rather use iptables because it has the features that I need without needing a bunch of helper code to get some things working or not having an equivalent feature. Not to mention it

Re: [pfSense-discussion] licience of php interface ?

2006-02-28 Thread Nick Buraglio
Isn't a lot of this substantially lower layer feature? A lot (not the static udp stuff) of what you're wanting is pf level development work. That said, last time I had looked at the pf list (which was a whiile ago) they were not interested in adding a lot of goo into pf, but instead

Re: [pfSense-discussion] licience of php interface ?

2006-02-28 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 2/28/06, Adam Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Truthfully... I tend to like m0n0wall's look for an interface better than pfsense. Crap... there goes my opinions leaking out. It is the features of pfsense that make up for it though :). Forgive me for nitpicking, but have you checked