Re: [pfSense-discussion] acx100 and 1.2 beta

2007-08-07 Thread Paul M
Marius Schrecker wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently running 1.0.1 (developer) with the acx100 native driver > from kewl.org which I compiled using the recommended patch. Works okay, > but I remember it being quite a bit of work. > > What's the status on this driver in 1.2? Will it be built-in, or

[pfSense-discussion] acx100 and 1.2 beta

2007-08-07 Thread Marius Schrecker
Hi, I'm currently running 1.0.1 (developer) with the acx100 native driver from kewl.org which I compiled using the recommended patch. Works okay, but I remember it being quite a bit of work. What's the status on this driver in 1.2? Will it be built-in, or easier to compile, or is there a proce

Re: [pfSense-discussion] jumbo frames

2007-08-07 Thread Nick Buraglio
On 8/7/07, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 01:00:55PM +, Nick Buraglio wrote: > > Is there a reason you're running jumbo frames? If you're going to > > I need more performance on NFS and RDP (assuming, RDP can make > use of jumbo frames -- I'm not sure, and t

Re: [pfSense-discussion] jumbo frames

2007-08-07 Thread Adam Armstrong
Greg Hennessy wrote: I've just switched to jumbo frames on the home network (enabled jumbo frames (mtu 9014) on NIC and one switch). I'm running a recentish (1.2-BETA-1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-05-11-2007) pfsense on WRAP, with mtu 1500 there (I don't think WRAP NICs can do jumbo frames). Should I run i

Re: [pfSense-discussion] jumbo frames

2007-08-07 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 01:00:55PM +, Nick Buraglio wrote: > Is there a reason you're running jumbo frames? If you're going to I need more performance on NFS and RDP (assuming, RDP can make use of jumbo frames -- I'm not sure, and the the current firmware of the switch doesn't show the jumbo

Re: [pfSense-discussion] jumbo frames

2007-08-07 Thread Nick Buraglio
Is there a reason you're running jumbo frames? If you're going to enable it you should run it on all interfaces that touch the segment. It will likely work on lower mtu devices but it is certainly not beat practice to mix and match. If you are running it internally to gain performance then yo

Re: [pfSense-discussion] jumbo frames

2007-08-07 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 08:59:30AM +0100, Greg Hennessy wrote: > If what I am reading above is correct, you've enabled it on a workstation > and on the switch but not on the firewall ? IIRC WRAP NICs don't have jumbo fram support. It seems to be working, it must be fragmenting the oversized MTUs

RE: [pfSense-discussion] jumbo frames

2007-08-07 Thread Greg Hennessy
> > I've just switched to jumbo frames on the home network (enabled > jumbo frames (mtu 9014) on NIC and one switch). I'm running a recentish > (1.2-BETA-1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-05-11-2007) pfsense on WRAP, with > mtu 1500 there (I don't think WRAP NICs can do jumbo frames). > > Should I run into pro