Re: [pfSense-discussion] centralized management with distributed pfsense installations

2008-12-22 Thread Paul Mansfield
Jason Dixon wrote: This is something I've been thinking about quite a bit lately. I'd like to see something modular that could potentially be used on any PF-based system. If there are others interested in this (or already working on it), please contact me. I nice feature I'd like would be

[pfSense-discussion] atom + US15W pico ITX board

2008-12-22 Thread Paul Mansfield
we've been a close observer of low-power CPUs and chipsets, because a lot of our costs are colocation fees which are mainly about power. In theory Pouslbo/US15W is much more efficient than the usual atom + desktop chipset, but it not particularly common... then I came across this:

Re: [pfSense-discussion] atom + US15W pico ITX board

2008-12-22 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 05:26:24PM +, Paul Mansfield wrote: we've been a close observer of low-power CPUs and chipsets, because a lot of our costs are colocation fees which are mainly about power. In theory Pouslbo/US15W is much more efficient than the usual atom + desktop chipset, but