Re: [pfSense-discussion] BGP to get Internet
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote: > I thought you corrected .php to exclude Gateway input field. So I just > modify config.xml and never go to gui to modify WAN interface, right? Yep, that boxes WAN IP never changes. Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: discussion-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
Re: [pfSense-discussion] BGP to get Internet
From: "Scott Ullrich" Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] BGP to get Internet On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote: Thank you. Do you have xml for 1.2.3-RC3 so I could try it? Evgeny. em1 100 Mb XXX.XXX.XX.XXX 30 Scott I thought you corrected .php to exclude Gateway input field. So I just modify config.xml and never go to gui to modify WAN interface, right? Thank you. Evgeny. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: discussion-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
Re: [pfSense-discussion] Rebecca L. Bowman/CHMCA is out of the office.
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Chris Buechler wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 5:38 PM, wrote: > > > I'd like you all to know that unlike Ms. Bowman I will be in the > > office or at least available more or less at all times. I kind of > > live on the internet. Thanks. > > That was confidential!! ;) So, why do you break that confidentiality then ;) ? > On a serious note, I wish people would configure their mail servers to > only send out of office replies when they are expressly listed in the to > or cc lines. Unfortunately, you can't fight stupidity over email, looks like :( Unsubscribing offendors might be rude but, arguably, efficient, IMO. This "confidentiality" thing is irritating me like hell, but I'll have to live with it, I guess. I'd ruther not, if I had the choice. Cheers, -- Cristian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: discussion-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
Re: [pfSense-discussion] Rebecca L. Bowman/CHMCA is out of the office.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 5:38 PM, wrote: > I'd like you all to know that unlike Ms. Bowman I will be in the office or > at least available more or less at all times. I kind of live on the > internet. Thanks. > That was confidential!! ;) On a serious note, I wish people would configure their mail servers to only send out of office replies when they are expressly listed in the to or cc lines. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: discussion-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
Re: [pfSense-discussion] Rebecca L. Bowman/CHMCA is out of the office.
I'd like you all to know that unlike Ms. Bowman I will be in the office or at least available more or less at all times. I kind of live on the internet. Thanks. On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:03 PM, wrote: > I will be out of the office starting Fri 10/23/2009 and will not return > until Mon 11/02/2009. > > I will respond to your message when I return. > > The information in this message is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any > disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or > omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. > Please delete the message and immediately contact the sender if you have > received this message in error. > > >
[pfSense-discussion] Rebecca L. Bowman/CHMCA is out of the office.
I will be out of the office starting Fri 10/23/2009 and will not return until Mon 11/02/2009. I will respond to your message when I return. The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please delete the message and immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error.
Re: [pfSense-discussion] BGP to get Internet
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote: > Thank you. Do you have xml for 1.2.3-RC3 so I could try it? > Evgeny. em1 100 Mb XXX.XXX.XX.XXX 30 Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: discussion-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
Re: [pfSense-discussion] BGP to get Internet
Scott Ullrich wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote: Hello! sorry if this topic was brought up before but... I am running several pfSense-BGP installations but they are all for redundancy purposes over several links. Does anybody run pfSense with BGP and two Internet providers? My concern is default gateway... if you have to specify default gateway when you configure WAN interface then it should have less metric as the one received via BGP. May be I am missing something here. Thanks. I do. It requires removing the default gateway from the XML and not visiting the WAN page again afterwards. Works fine, has been in use for over a year now since the 2008 hackathon. Scott Thank you. Do you have xml for 1.2.3-RC3 so I could try it? Evgeny. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: discussion-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
Re: [pfSense-discussion] BGP to get Internet
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote: > Hello! > > sorry if this topic was brought up before but... > I am running several pfSense-BGP installations but they are all for > redundancy purposes over several links. > > Does anybody run pfSense with BGP and two Internet providers? > My concern is default gateway... if you have to specify default gateway when > you configure WAN interface then it should have less metric as the one > received via BGP. > May be I am missing something here. > Thanks. I do. It requires removing the default gateway from the XML and not visiting the WAN page again afterwards. Works fine, has been in use for over a year now since the 2008 hackathon. Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: discussion-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
[pfSense-discussion] BGP to get Internet
Hello! sorry if this topic was brought up before but... I am running several pfSense-BGP installations but they are all for redundancy purposes over several links. Does anybody run pfSense with BGP and two Internet providers? My concern is default gateway... if you have to specify default gateway when you configure WAN interface then it should have less metric as the one received via BGP. May be I am missing something here. Thanks. Evgeny. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: discussion-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
[pfSense-discussion] E1G42ETBLK
Decided to go along with SuperServer 5015A-H after all (199 EUR sans VAT, can't really argue with that, and 8 W power). Anyone been running E1G42ETBLK http://www.acmemicro.com/estore/merchant.ihtml?pid=6944&step=4 with pfSense 1.2.3RC-3? This seems like the cheapest multiport Intel NIC around. -- Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org __ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE - To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: discussion-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
