Re: [pfSense-discussion] Snmp monitoring

2010-09-06 Thread Robert Mortimer
You can always check for the same two IP addresses that you load balancer does. - Original Message - > Hi everyone! > > Is there any recommended way to monitor the Load Balancer status over > snmp? > > I mean, I'd like to setup an alarm that would check over SNMP if one > of > the intern

Re: [pfSense-discussion] override routes on WAN

2010-05-04 Thread Robert Mortimer
- "Eugen Leitl" wrote: > I'm attempting to simulate a production network 88.198.238.112/28 > with gateway 88.198.238.113 on the OPT1 interface (set to > 88.198.238.113) > but I'm too dense to figure out how override the default route, which > sends > the packet to WAN. > > I obviously need

Re: [pfSense-discussion] start on safe mode

2009-01-19 Thread Robert Mortimer
Chris Buechler wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Zied Fakhfakh wrote: Hi, I need to start pfSense, always on SAFE MODE, can someone point me to a good documentation ? What do you mean by "safe mode"? Zydoon wrote: when I start pfSense normally it hangs somewhere at a line like this:

Re: Re[2]: [pfSense-discussion] Multiple IP on WAN

2006-08-20 Thread Robert Mortimer
autocreate when using protforwarding, it sets up the right rules for you). Holger -Original Message- From: Robert Mortimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 10:55 PM To: discussion@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Multiple IP on WAN Try Interfaces >

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Multiple IP on WAN

2006-08-18 Thread Robert Mortimer
Try Interfaces > Assign > VLAN I think this is what you want ---Robert - Original Message - From: "Chris Noble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 7:27 PM Subject: [pfSense-discussion] Multiple IP on WAN Hi there, I have 8 ips with my isp and would like to us

RE: [pfSense-discussion] Limiting access through table

2006-07-31 Thread Robert Mortimer
> Am Mittwoch, den 26.07.2006, 18:38 -0700 schrieb krt: > > You can do a connection limit on a rule with a specific > proto/port, i.e. > > simultaneous client connection limit/max state entries per host/max new > > connections per second. > Yes I know that already. Take a look at the created ruleba