On 6/21/06, Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And with this, I'm out of this thread. (What *is* it with *BSD
people?)
Simple - They don't take shit from anyone.
Eugen - feel free to just use m0n0wall... m0n0wall is great at what m0n0wall
does. And m0n0wall users get the default m0n0wall
Title: Message
Do you
have a link to that howto please?
--
C.
Falconer
http://www.avonside.school.nz/
http://criggie.dyndns.org/
-Original Message-From: Allen Laymon
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 19 May 2006 12:25
a.m.To: discussion@pfsense.comSubject:
Yes - it works fine.
However you will loose your RRD graphs at reboot, and to do a firmware
update you need to change /etc/platform back to pfSense, then reboot, then
upgrade, then reboot, then change /etc/platform back to embedded, then
reboot.
Also while the machine is in the embedded state,
You can use the PC platform like an embedded one by
echo embedded /etc/platform
Then reboot. When your box is in this state, the CF/HDD is read-only.
But you loose access to packages and firmware upgrades.
(to reenable normal mode
echo pfSense /etc/platform
Then reboot
Anyone in New Zealand want to acquire some Nokia IP 330 boxes?
Seems that domainz is flogging some off - price is $100 NZ each plus freight
Give me a couple days and I'll be able to tell you :)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 6 April 2006 9:34 a.m.
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Nokia IP330
Craig FALCONER wrote:
Anyone in New Zealand want
That version of Vmware is prehistoric, and probably only emulates a 10 Mbit
AMD PCNet nic.
Try testing from the host OS on your source machine.
The best method for testing bulk is iperf, or this Avalance thing is more
real-world.
-Original Message-
From: Chun Wong [mailto:[EMAIL
--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
Von: Craig FALCONER [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: discussion@pfsense.com
Betreff: RE: [pfSense-discussion] throughput - cpu, bus
Datum: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:40:13 +1300
That version of Vmware is prehistoric, and probably only emulates a 10
Mbit AMD PCNet nic
That's cos your pfsense box is a computer, not a switch.
The difference is that in an uplink port, the tx/rx lines are swapped over,
so that two switches think they're talking to a computer at the other end.
Some switches do this automagically. If you remember modems and serial,
then its
Sounds like telnor.net is blocking stuff.
Try mtr and see if it works. I can get to 200.76.246.66 without loosing
anything if I use mtr.
My traceroute [v0.69]
socks (0.0.0.0)(tos=0x0 psize=64 bitpattern=0x00) Wed Feb
22 09:00:22 2006
Someone! FAQ this!
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 19 February 2006 10:55 a.m.
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Why is it called pfsense?
Actually the running joke is that it means penguin fucker sense ;)
On
No. You need a monitor to begin with, but once config is done you should
never need it again.
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ihavenoname
Sent: Friday, 30 December 2005 9:53 a.m.
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense-discussion] Headless boot
Yeah - that's been fixed in the latest version.
/tic
-Original Message-
From: Jason J Ellingson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 29 December 2005 12:11 p.m.
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense-discussion] 132 days
Finally had to reboot the pfSense box
09:10 Criggie is 0.92 official yet?
09:10 @lsf Criggie: read the forum :)
09:10 @lsf it was pulled
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 5 November 2005 8:40 a.m.
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] *dances*
Give it
Use the 128 - it'll be fine. Put the 1Gb in your camera or flog it off to
someone with a CF based camera.
Or get a USB/CF reader and use it as portable storage :)
-Original Message-
From: Mojo Jojo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 October 2005 5:06 p.m.
To:
-
From: Craig FALCONER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 15 September 2005 11:51 a.m.
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense-discussion] Massive Boot delay during load
Very interesting - I had a similar delay when booting 0.84 in a vmware
machine. I know for sure it had a floppy
Very interesting - I had a similar delay when booting 0.84 in a vmware
machine. I know for sure it had a floppy image attached.
Tomorrow I'll remove the fdd and see if that was the cause of the delay and
kswapd thrash that I mentioned to Scott on the irc channel.
-Original Message-
Craig - there has been some discussion about the reliability of the realtek
nics generally. I see that you're using a newer chipset than the 8129 and
8139 chipsets.
You're a test case :)
-Original Message-
From: Craig Roy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 8 September 2005 4:40
18 matches
Mail list logo
