Re: [pfSense-discussion] Re: [Spam SpamAssassin=3,07] Re: [pfSense-discussion] Everything else sucks
CVSTrac has everything you ever wanted to know and more. Please use it. On 3/11/06, RoboK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can I ask you please, what changes you made in traffic shaper in > RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT_03-10-2006/ ? > > - Original Message - > From: "Bill Marquette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 5:07 PM > Subject: [Spam SpamAssassin=3,07] Re: [pfSense-discussion] Everything else > sucks > > > "Now with better traffic shaping". Many thanks go to our new dev. > Leon on the find (and fix). > > --Bill > > On 3/11/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fresh out of the oven: > > > > http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT_03-10-2006/ > > > > > > On 3/11/06, Randy B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've spent the last month making a grand tour of the firewall world - > > > tried everything from IPCop to Smoothwall, a fully-licensed PIX-515E > > > from work to m0n0wall, and I still come back to pfSense. Not only is > > > this my hobby, I oversee a flock of ~70 PIXen & FWSMs at work every > > > day. > > > > > > There's just nothing quite as feature-rich, easy to use, or quick to > > > set up. GNAP comes close, and I'm working on making some custom > > > extensions to it that may draw me away from pfSense again, but making > > > it do 95% of what I want takes _so long_. I just wish I was more > > > conversant with *BSD so I could really dig under the covers like I did > > > on the Linux-based ones, even though I was greatly disappointed when I > > > did. > > > > > > Granted, you're going to get more horsepower, support, and scalability > > > with a commercial appliance, but they leave out things that should be > > > simple - like setting up port-forwarding. Then there are the *really > > > nice* things, like 3rd-party extensions. > > > > > > Like I said, I may be drawn away again some day, but for the time > > > being I'm back to stay. In that light, is there anything newer than > > > Beta-2? > > > > > > RB > > > > > > > > -- > http://www.slovaknet.sk - Domena EU + profesionalny webhosting na rok > ZADARMO. > 7. 4. budu rozdelovane "cool" nazvy - NEVAHEJTE UZ ANI MINUTU! > > > > > -- > http://www.slovaknet.sk - Domena EU + profesionalny webhosting na rok ZADARMO. > 7. 4. budu rozdelovane "cool" nazvy - NEVAHEJTE UZ ANI MINUTU! > >
[pfSense-discussion] Re: [Spam SpamAssassin=3,07] Re: [pfSense-discussion] Everything else sucks
Can I ask you please, what changes you made in traffic shaper in RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT_03-10-2006/ ? - Original Message - From: "Bill Marquette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 5:07 PM Subject: [Spam SpamAssassin=3,07] Re: [pfSense-discussion] Everything else sucks "Now with better traffic shaping". Many thanks go to our new dev. Leon on the find (and fix). --Bill On 3/11/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fresh out of the oven: > > http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT_03-10-2006/ > > > On 3/11/06, Randy B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've spent the last month making a grand tour of the firewall world - > > tried everything from IPCop to Smoothwall, a fully-licensed PIX-515E > > from work to m0n0wall, and I still come back to pfSense. Not only is > > this my hobby, I oversee a flock of ~70 PIXen & FWSMs at work every > > day. > > > > There's just nothing quite as feature-rich, easy to use, or quick to > > set up. GNAP comes close, and I'm working on making some custom > > extensions to it that may draw me away from pfSense again, but making > > it do 95% of what I want takes _so long_. I just wish I was more > > conversant with *BSD so I could really dig under the covers like I did > > on the Linux-based ones, even though I was greatly disappointed when I > > did. > > > > Granted, you're going to get more horsepower, support, and scalability > > with a commercial appliance, but they leave out things that should be > > simple - like setting up port-forwarding. Then there are the *really > > nice* things, like 3rd-party extensions. > > > > Like I said, I may be drawn away again some day, but for the time > > being I'm back to stay. In that light, is there anything newer than > > Beta-2? > > > > RB > > > -- http://www.slovaknet.sk - Domena EU + profesionalny webhosting na rok ZADARMO. 7. 4. budu rozdelovane "cool" nazvy - NEVAHEJTE UZ ANI MINUTU! -- http://www.slovaknet.sk - Domena EU + profesionalny webhosting na rok ZADARMO. 7. 4. budu rozdelovane "cool" nazvy - NEVAHEJTE UZ ANI MINUTU!
Re: [pfSense-discussion] Everything else sucks
The fix btw, does NOT require the wizard to be re-run. A reboot (which you already did to upgrade) is all that's needed. --Bill On 3/11/06, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Now with better traffic shaping". Many thanks go to our new dev. > Leon on the find (and fix). > > --Bill > > On 3/11/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fresh out of the oven: > > > > http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT_03-10-2006/ > > > > > > On 3/11/06, Randy B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've spent the last month making a grand tour of the firewall world - > > > tried everything from IPCop to Smoothwall, a fully-licensed PIX-515E > > > from work to m0n0wall, and I still come back to pfSense. Not only is > > > this my hobby, I oversee a flock of ~70 PIXen & FWSMs at work every > > > day. > > > > > > There's just nothing quite as feature-rich, easy to use, or quick to > > > set up. GNAP comes close, and I'm working on making some custom > > > extensions to it that may draw me away from pfSense again, but making > > > it do 95% of what I want takes _so long_. I just wish I was more > > > conversant with *BSD so I could really dig under the covers like I did > > > on the Linux-based ones, even though I was greatly disappointed when I > > > did. > > > > > > Granted, you're going to get more horsepower, support, and scalability > > > with a commercial appliance, but they leave out things that should be > > > simple - like setting up port-forwarding. Then there are the *really > > > nice* things, like 3rd-party extensions. > > > > > > Like I said, I may be drawn away again some day, but for the time > > > being I'm back to stay. In that light, is there anything newer than > > > Beta-2? > > > > > > RB > > > > > >
Re: [pfSense-discussion] Everything else sucks
"Now with better traffic shaping". Many thanks go to our new dev. Leon on the find (and fix). --Bill On 3/11/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fresh out of the oven: > > http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT_03-10-2006/ > > > On 3/11/06, Randy B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've spent the last month making a grand tour of the firewall world - > > tried everything from IPCop to Smoothwall, a fully-licensed PIX-515E > > from work to m0n0wall, and I still come back to pfSense. Not only is > > this my hobby, I oversee a flock of ~70 PIXen & FWSMs at work every > > day. > > > > There's just nothing quite as feature-rich, easy to use, or quick to > > set up. GNAP comes close, and I'm working on making some custom > > extensions to it that may draw me away from pfSense again, but making > > it do 95% of what I want takes _so long_. I just wish I was more > > conversant with *BSD so I could really dig under the covers like I did > > on the Linux-based ones, even though I was greatly disappointed when I > > did. > > > > Granted, you're going to get more horsepower, support, and scalability > > with a commercial appliance, but they leave out things that should be > > simple - like setting up port-forwarding. Then there are the *really > > nice* things, like 3rd-party extensions. > > > > Like I said, I may be drawn away again some day, but for the time > > being I'm back to stay. In that light, is there anything newer than > > Beta-2? > > > > RB > > >
Re: [pfSense-discussion] Everything else sucks
Fresh out of the oven: http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT_03-10-2006/ On 3/11/06, Randy B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've spent the last month making a grand tour of the firewall world - > tried everything from IPCop to Smoothwall, a fully-licensed PIX-515E > from work to m0n0wall, and I still come back to pfSense. Not only is > this my hobby, I oversee a flock of ~70 PIXen & FWSMs at work every > day. > > There's just nothing quite as feature-rich, easy to use, or quick to > set up. GNAP comes close, and I'm working on making some custom > extensions to it that may draw me away from pfSense again, but making > it do 95% of what I want takes _so long_. I just wish I was more > conversant with *BSD so I could really dig under the covers like I did > on the Linux-based ones, even though I was greatly disappointed when I > did. > > Granted, you're going to get more horsepower, support, and scalability > with a commercial appliance, but they leave out things that should be > simple - like setting up port-forwarding. Then there are the *really > nice* things, like 3rd-party extensions. > > Like I said, I may be drawn away again some day, but for the time > being I'm back to stay. In that light, is there anything newer than > Beta-2? > > RB >
[pfSense-discussion] Everything else sucks
I've spent the last month making a grand tour of the firewall world - tried everything from IPCop to Smoothwall, a fully-licensed PIX-515E from work to m0n0wall, and I still come back to pfSense. Not only is this my hobby, I oversee a flock of ~70 PIXen & FWSMs at work every day. There's just nothing quite as feature-rich, easy to use, or quick to set up. GNAP comes close, and I'm working on making some custom extensions to it that may draw me away from pfSense again, but making it do 95% of what I want takes _so long_. I just wish I was more conversant with *BSD so I could really dig under the covers like I did on the Linux-based ones, even though I was greatly disappointed when I did. Granted, you're going to get more horsepower, support, and scalability with a commercial appliance, but they leave out things that should be simple - like setting up port-forwarding. Then there are the *really nice* things, like 3rd-party extensions. Like I said, I may be drawn away again some day, but for the time being I'm back to stay. In that light, is there anything newer than Beta-2? RB
