Re: [pfSense-discussion] Intrusion Prevention Systems

2005-09-20 Thread Scott Ullrich
Now we're talking. Someone step up to the plate and make a package :) Scott On 9/20/05, Robert Depenbrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Scott Ullrich wrote: > > > It's written in perl. You do NOT want to use this as its delayed > > reaction to issues will be a lot more th

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Intrusion Prevention Systems

2005-09-20 Thread Robert Depenbrock
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Scott Ullrich wrote: > It's written in perl. You do NOT want to use this as its delayed > reaction to issues will be a lot more than a C version. > > Scott Hi Scott, This is an forked version of the original snort2pf. This version is written in C . http://snort2c.sourcefo

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Intrusion Prevention Systems

2005-09-20 Thread Scott Ullrich
It's written in perl. You do NOT want to use this as its delayed reaction to issues will be a lot more than a C version. Scott On 9/20/05, Robert Depenbrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Tommaso Di Donato wrote: > > > mmh... I am not a freebsd guru, but some times ago I fou

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Intrusion Prevention Systems

2005-09-20 Thread Robert Depenbrock
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Tommaso Di Donato wrote: > mmh... I am not a freebsd guru, but some times ago I found this > http://freebsd.rogness.net/snort_inline/ Hi! what about http://snort2c.sourceforge.net/ seems to be also very interesting for pfsense. regards Robert Depenbrock -- nic-hdl RD

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Intrusion Prevention Systems

2005-09-19 Thread Tommaso Di Donato
On 9/19/05, Gary Buckmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Pf and IPFW are significantly different these days.  I'm sure Scott or Bill could give you a full rundown of how different but for something as complicated as snort_inline (as opposed to snort-inline) I would expect a significant amount

RE: [pfSense-discussion] Intrusion Prevention Systems

2005-09-19 Thread Gary Buckmaster
done with pfsense.    -Gary -Original Message-From: Tommaso Di Donato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 8:58 AMTo: discussion@pfsense.comSubject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Intrusion Prevention Systems mmh... I am not a freebsd guru, but some times ago I found thi

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Intrusion Prevention Systems

2005-09-19 Thread Tommaso Di Donato
mmh... I am not a freebsd guru, but some times ago I found this http://freebsd.rogness.net/snort_inline/ (I know is realted to ipfw.. but maybe it could be possible to work on it) Ah...by the way.. An IPS would be very attractive.. but I think it is something very difficult to tune-up, so I think

RE: [pfSense-discussion] Intrusion Prevention Systems

2005-09-19 Thread Gary Buckmaster
:47 PM To: discussion@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense-discussion] Intrusion Prevention Systems Hi Is it possible to get snort-inline to play with packet filter on pfsense? Or is there another Intrusion prevention System option available for pfsense? Chris

[pfSense-discussion] Intrusion Prevention Systems

2005-09-17 Thread christiaan
Hi Is it possible to get snort-inline to play with packet filter on pfsense? Or is there another Intrusion prevention System option available for pfsense? Chris